Revelation 17:4 and the sexual gnosticism of the eucharist - CUPOLA/COPULA

A RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE:


(ME AND THE AUTHOR OF THE AVLES BLOGS HAVE FALLEN OUT DUE TO SEVERE DOCTRINAL DIFFERENCES. NEVERTHELESS, HE IS 100% CORRECT IN HIS EXPOSÉ OF THESE SEDUCERS. THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PUBLICATIONS ON THIS BLOG)

"Sorcha Faal", another avatar of the Great Whore

 >

Above image

"...REMEMBER: an upside down glass/cup, hides something. The same thing that has been hidden in the reversed cup/glass, once the cup/glass has been turned in upright stand, it is showed to you and offered to you...."

URL: https://control-avles-blogs.blogspot.com/2025/02/a-golden-dome-in-her-hand-full-of.html?m=0

Luke 4

5And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. 6And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. 

Revelation 18:3

“For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.”

https://spirithismouth.blogspot.com/2025/05/sorcha-faal-another-avatar-of-great.html?m=0

Shockingly, the reversed cup spiritual inspiration of architecture is admitted by the servants of the devil themselves, although through a side channel and not Rome directly. Much like important information leaks come through non mainstream papers. And what information it is. . . .

http://www.gnosis.org/gnosis_eucharist1.html

The Gnosis of The Eucharist

 by Stephan A. Hoeller

 

he Mass, or, as it is sometimes called, the divine liturgy or the Eucharist, is the most solemn of all the Christian sacraments. Through it we are led step by step to the purpose of our earthly lives -- union with the divine -- for at its climax the faithful are made one with God and each other by receiving the body and blood of Christ under the earthly forms of bread and wine.

Although these mystical aspects of the Mass have been known and proclaimed by all the branches of Christendom that have not abandoned the ancient sacramental system (including the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and, with some ambiguities, the Anglican), the rationalistic tendencies that have arisen since the Second Vatican Council in the Roman Catholic Church are robbing the Mass of much of its numinosity and psychospiritual utility.

Similarly, many in the occult, metaphysical, and New Age movements have little appreciation for the magic and mystery of the time-honored sacramental system of Christianity and within it for the supreme sacrament of the Mass. The older of these movements bear the imprint of nineteenth-century thinking, which was hyperintellectual, moralistic, and at times materialistic. The groups that have sprung up since the 1960's are a bit more favorably disposed toward ritual than their predecessors, but their appreciation of the sacraments is still small. Much of alternative spirituality is thus in danger of losing touch with one of the most valuable aspects of the mystico-magical heritage of the West.

To be sure, there are valid objections to ritual. Its practice has often been accompanied by blind superstition. Still, it must be remembered that a lack of consciousness will regularly turn meaningful and transformative practices into superstitious ones. The fault is not with the ritual, but with the practitioner. Ritual, provided it uses authentic symbols, is no more or less than what H.P. Blavatsky called "concretized truth." This may be covered up by superstition, but the hidden truth is always discernable beneath the covering. Gnostic studies of the sacraments are intended to free the kernel of truth from the accretions of unconsciousness and misunderstanding that have been permitted to obscure it.

In the following we shall deal with several separate approaches to the greatest of the Christian mysteries. Some of these may contradict each other, while others tend to complement one another, and still others will restate truths present in other approaches.

 

Dogmatic and Rationalistic Views

The non-Gnostic church after the third and fourth centuries A.D. regarded the Eucharist as a commemoration of the meal Jesus is said to have shared with his apostles, where he is said to have blessed bread and wine, admonishing those present to do the same in remembrance of him. Christendom made it into dogma that Jesus mystically changed these substances into his body and blood and gave authority to his apostles to perform the same sacred miracle until the end of time. The mystery of the Eucharist was thus transferred to the mental realm of belief, although mythic elements continued to subsist under the façade of dogma. Protestant Christendom gradually came to deny this mystically inspired any mythically reinforced dogma. The Eucharist became a mere memorial meal, a sign rather than a symbol.

Today, the Roman Catholic Church is undergoing an internal reformation whose effects on the Mass are not unlike those produced by the revolt of Luther and Calvin. Twenty-five years ago one could still observe nuns herding their small charges to the communion rail while admonishing them, "Don't chew the Baby Jesus," while today almost all awe and reverence for the Mass and the consecrated elements seem to have evaporated. Kneeling for communion, receiving the sacrament on the tongue, and other ancient rules reflecting numinous dignity have gone by the wayside. A traditionalist-inspired pun declares that the present Mass ought to be spelled "mess," and this writer tends to agree.

The trivialization and desacralization of the Mass are but a natural outcome of the intellectualization of this mystery, which in essence began at the time Constantine established the church and the church established its dogmas, while casting out the Gnosis. The mind is the slayer of the real; numinous myth and transcendental mystery cannot survive rationalism, whether in the form of Aristotelian theology or in the shape of the modernism of Hans Küng and his fellows. Dogma is the murder of mystery, even if it takes centuries for the victim to die.

The Mass As Sacred Mystery Drama

The mysteries in the pre-Christian era were elaborately devised ritual dramas contrived to intensify the spiritual transformation of the initiate. They were usually patterned after the mythic life, death, and resurrection of a particular deity to whom the mystery was dedicated. The candidate was usually made to symbolically undergo certain events in the life story of the hero. This is still evident in the initiation rituals of Freemasonry, particularly in the sublime degree of Master Mason, where the candidate undergoes the death and rising again of the Masonic hero Hiram Abiff.

It does not take much imagination to see in the Christian Mass the elements of the same ritual drama, wherein the life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus are symbolically reenacted by the priests and worshippers. The fact that the Eucharist is a mythic dramatization of the career of Jesus has been recognized by the church for a very long time. As Pope Innocent III stated, "The Mass is arranged upon a plan so well conceived that everything done by Jesus Christ or concerning Him, from His Incarnation to His Ascension, is there largely contained either in words or in actions, wonderfully presented."

The Gnostic would contend that this is undoubtedly true, but that the reenactment of the drama does not concern the historical Jesus alone, but involves the Divine Man resident in each human being. Myth is truer and more powerful than history, and the events in the life of Jesus are elevated to mythic significance by the symbolic relation of his drama to the drama of the transforming human spirit. As Joseph Campbell said, the Mass is "a metaphor open to transcendence," and as such it is capable of miraculous effects in transforming not only bread and wine, but the human personality as well. The great fault of non-Gnostic Christianity has always been to reduce myth with a meaning to history with a moral, and this is what happened to the Mass at the hands of the theologians.

The pagans of antiquity were convinced that humans could undergo apotheosis, that they could become gods and goddesses. The Mass is closely connected with this process, since in its mysteries earthly substances are transmuted into divine ones, and, more important, humans may be similarly transformed in their psychospiritual natures. The ancient Gnostics for the most part seem to have held that Jesus was a human being who, very much like a hero in the pagan tradition, became divine as a result of his spiritual virtue. Jesus the hero became Christ the God. (This event is said to have been finalized, as it were, on the occasion of the baptism of Jesus in the river Jordan, which was called the Epiphany, or the manifestation of Christ to the world.)

The imitatio Christi, when understood as copying the moral qualities of the Christed Jesus, borders on absurdity. How could a fallible mortal imitate the Divine One descended to earth? On the other hand, the main body of the liturgical work of the church is involved in an imitation of a different order. In the church calendar the events of the life of Jesus are relived, from Christmas to Ascension and beyond. The four-day cycle of Easter (Maundy Thursday, Good Friday, Holy Saturday, and Easter Sunday) is an intense reliving of the core drama of the Passion and resurrection. And the celebration of the Eucharist is a daily reenactment of this same drama, fortified by the mystical communion one may partake of with the hero himself. The imitation of Christ is the deification, the transformation, of the human being, and the Mass continues to be the most efficacious means of that transformation, at least as far as the Christian tradition is concerned. Only Gnosis, experienced within the Gnostic tradition, discloses this fact to us in all its promise and wonder.

 

The Mass As Magic

Ritual that reenacts authentic mythic themes always possesses a magic of its own. While magic may be anathema to the rationalist, it is an old friend to the lover of myth and ritual. The magic of the Mass is the operational effect of the lived myth upon the participants. People can have visions, experience expansions of consciousness, undergo healing, and engage in effective prayer during the Mass. Still, to overemphasize the magical element of this rite would be inaccurate, and would put one in the same league as the person who defined the combustion engine as "noise, speed, and stink." It is wise to have a balanced attitude toward this issue and to refrain from any attempt either to rob the Mass of its magic or to turn it into ceremonial magic pure and simple. (The much-publicized but rather infrequent phenomenon of the Black Mass is an example of the latter.)

he magical aspects of the mystery are acknowledged in the very liturgy of the Eucharist itself: Prayers are said for the living, for the dead, for particular intentions. It has always been considered legitimate for persons attending the Eucharist to pray for private concerns. On the other hand, one ought to participate in the mystery of the Mass for its own sake, and not in order to "get results" of any particular kind. If one comes only to obtain specific favors from the deity, this would interfere with the nature and amount of grace received. Eventually one would miss the true significance of the Mass entirely. A mystery of such magnitude should never be allowed to degenerate into a forum for airing petty concerns in the face of transcendence.

C.W. Leadbeater, the theosophist and Liberal Catholic bishop, in his work The Science of the Sacraments, made some fascinating observations on the magic of the Mass. With his paranormal faculties Leadbeater perceived certain recurring patterns of forces not ordinarily visible that manifested at each celebration of the Eucharist. The pattern seemed to organize itself into a form that described as a sort of structure resembling a spire or cupola.

cupola.......
 
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CE%BA%CF%8D%CF%80%CE%B5%CE%BB%CE%BB%CE%BF%CE%BD#Ancient_Greek

κύπελλον

Noun

κύπελλον • (kúpellon) n (genitive κῠπέλλου); second declension

1. drinking-cup, goblet

Etymology

A widespread wanderwort and probably of Pre-Greek origin given the variants. Furnee compares κύπη (kúpē, “kind of ship”), κύβος (kúbos, “cube, square”), κύμβη (kúmbē, “drinking vessel”), and κόμβος (kómbos, “roll”). Also compare Latin cupa (“cask, vat, tub”) and Sanskrit कूप (kūpa, “pit, well, hole”).

This "dagoba" or "cupola" has a suspicious look. From the outside as an entirety, roman catholic cathedrals look like pregnant women. Now we have a hidden phallic reference. And consider the verse

 having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:  -----REVELATION 17:4 KJB

It would seem Leadbeater, the author of this gnostic-antichristian-catholic work, was forced by the Lord to betray the hidden character of the work being done in the "eucharist"... which is, for the lack of a better expresson, spiritual fornication resulting in the filling of a giant used spiritual condom! Oh, mr. Leadbeater..... Lead is the toxic metal that poisoned old pagan Rome. It is also the end product of radioactive degradation. A degraded man like the members and the founder of this orgiastic quasi-catholic cult. Liberal in everything, except celibacy.... and why? Because for them (perverted +children +men +whores) sex is a sacrament.... and more importantly, SACRAMENTS ARE SPIRITUAL SEX. The world is definitely not being deified by the liturgy under the dome; it is being coupled/copulated with hell.

James Ingall Wedgwood (24 March 1883 – 13 March 1951) was the first Presiding Bishop of the Liberal Catholic Church. Wedgwood was a former Anglican, a member of the Theosophical Society and a member of a co-Masonic order. His work on the Liberal Rite, as well as his efforts to establish a progressive church, are his greatest legacies.

Wedgwood was a homosexual with what he described as an "almost unbelievably strong" sexual urge (he once visited 18 public toilets in two hours, explaining to police that he had been "searching for a friend"). This was matched by a strong religious strain, and he was dominated by those two fundamental, but often conflicting, drives.

The man who founded this liberal catholic church was a sodomite sex maniac! Notice how Leadbeater uses the word "swelling" and "erection" for the edifice?

 

Taken from:

http://www.sacredheartofjesustheologicalseminary.org/uploads/5/3/9/5/5395035/science_of_the_sacraments.pdf

Remember, in gnosticism sexual magic is a key part of reuniting with the true god. Sophia is the whore and the virgin.  The so called "christian" church, which is only the Imperial Harlot centered in Rome and Constantinople combines both roles as well.  But only the initiated or the prophets of the Lord know her secret. The key figure who first uses sexual language to describe the nature of the spiritual relationship is FALSE Dionysius the Areopagite who describes the creation and maintanence of the world as an ejaculation, much like Egyptian mythology where Atum's seed creates and Osiris's seed rejuvenates the world.

We must dare to say this beyond truth: the cause itself of all beings—by the beautiful and good eros of all and through the throwing forth of erotic goodness—comes to be outside of itself and into all beings through its providences and is, as it were, charmed by goodness, eros, and agape. In an ecstatic power beyond being, it is brought down out of a separation from all and beyond all, to what is in all, yet does not wander out of itself. (DN IV.13)

The Egyptian inspiration of the Harlot is hinted in Proverbs 7:16. Neoplatonism and gnosticism, two cancerous philosophies began in Egypt as well. Plato was initiated in a secret society. 

I have decked my bed with coverings of tapestry, With carved works, with fine linen of Egypt

Indeed, why would otherwise these unbelievably depraved men be so obsessed with the Roman Catholic rites? But listen to what FALSE Dionysius says about communion with their "god". It is a whole spiritual and fleshly orgy:

“The divine eros,” he writes, “is ecstatic; it does not permit lovers to be among themselves but bids them to be among their lovers” (DN IV.13)

Now do you understand why there is such intense pleasure in this most abject and base idolatry? And why the Apostle Peter describes it as "filthy". Because Rome is the number 1 lady of the night, the top shelf street girl, the most skilled sex worker in bringing darkened hearts spiritual pleasure.

Consider the cunningness of the Devil. He is 100% fine with the exposing of fleshly acts in Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy. The scandalous behavior of the priests is in fact a smoke screen to obscure a truly profane religion. People asking questions like "how do they dare profane the holy church of God?" shows that the deception has taken hold. But the perverted spiritual character of its rituals is only something for the enlightened/open haters of God. Doing the most perverted thing while appearing most innocent is a whole new level of perversion in itself. The forbidden fruit of esoteric knowledge, the glimpse into the spiritual world brings immeasurable pleasure. And the fact that this has been going on for 1500+ years is a miracle in itself. But this bridge that will make the impossible possible - unite the world - and the Dome to shelter all from the coming wrath of the Lamb.....will in reality bury them. Come out of her (Rev 18:4) simply means the safety and the pleasure of it is the greatest deception of all. It was all foretold in Proverbs 5-7 and Revelation 17-18.

Another interesting related word to KUMBA/CUPA is:

Kumbaya

The word "kumbaya" is believed by many music historians to be pidgin English — and a transliteration — for the prayerful plea to God: "Come By Here." The lyrics are simple and innocent: Someone's singing, Lord, kumbaya. Or Someone's crying, Lord, kumbaya.

Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.

-------Matthew 24:23

Beginning in the 1990s and increasing in the following decades, references to "Kumbaya" or "singing 'Kumbaya'" entered idiomatic usage in the politics of the United States, often to suggest that someone other than the speaker is too conciliatory or eager to compromise.^[14][15] Richard Vatz has characterized these references to the song as sarcastic criticism of consensus "that allegedly does not examine the issues or is revelatory of cockeyed optimism."^[14]

For example, in discussing the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, U.S. President Barack Obama commented that the substantive disagreements between the parties "can't be reduced to somehow a matter of let's all hold hands and sing 'Kumbaya.'"^[16] Many other high-profile political figures have similarly referred derisively to the singing of the song as a way of expressing doubt or disparagement for potential compromise.^[15] Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee explained his skepticism that ideologically aligned candidates in the 2012 Republican Party presidential primaries would unite around a single individual by saying, "there's not going to be some magic moment at which three or four of these people sit around a campfire toasting marshmallows, singing 'Kumbaya' and giving the nod to one of their competitors."^[17] Businessman and political candidate Herman Cain, speaking to a rally in 2011, said, "Singing ‘Kumbaya’ is not a foreign policy strategy."^[14]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumbaya



=================================================

......There is no doubt these occultists are lying through their teeth about a great many things concerning God. But in one thing they are not lying - they are already receiving revelations and visions directly from the evil antichristian spirits in this world. And, as previously stated, since Vatican II the jesuits through various shaping tactics in science, religion and politics have been going ahead with their final program for world domination and the final purging of the concept of a male, Apocalyptic, angry, separating, Sovereign God who demands faithfulness and purity (The believers are described as totally spiritually pure and faithful in Revelation 14:4/17:14).

Soon all that will remain is a united (copulated) humanity worshiping the image of the antichrist and the sweet fornication of the Harlot in the "eucharist". (Rev 13). They will all be in bed with her! They will all be in her cup and so in her hand. But this will take all of their strength which is the righteousness of God! Her aesthetic and spiritual delicacies will leave humanity broke, morally bankrupt before God.

Her flattering doctrine of free will, human merit, dignity and goodness will doom most of the senseless sinners (With her much fair speech she caused him to yield, with the flattering of her lips she forced him. Proverbs 7:21). The autoeroticism of self-righteousness, fueled by these churches is another type of pleasure "offered in the cup". Total depravity + election is the doctrine the world has always rejected.

Here is a quote from this same Leadbeater that maybe gives a hint as to the future of the reinvented and reunited cathorthodox church which will "ride the beast" . He is just another piper that sets the tone/tune for the stupid and unspiritual children of men. The avant-garde Liberal Catholic church is the blueprint for the future, as we are already seeing the process of emasculation everywhere.

<<<<<"If Christians", he wrote, "had been content to take what Christ taught of the Father in heaven, they would never have saddled themselves with the jealous, angry, bloodthirsty Jehovah of Ezra, Nehemiah and the others – a god that needs propitiating and to whose 'mercy' constant appeals must be made.".......


Previously, Leadbeater had written on the energies of the Christian sacraments in The Science of the Sacraments: An Occult and Clairvoyant Study of the Christian Eucharist, one of the most significant works of Christian esotericism. In his prologue to the latest edition of this book, John Kersey refers to the Eucharist proposed by Leadbeater as "a radical reinterpretation of the context of the Eucharist seen within a theological standpoint of esoteric magic and universal salvation; it is Catholicism expressing the love of God to the full without the burdens of needless guilt and fear, and the false totem of the temporal powers of the church."^[63]>>>>>>

It makes perfect sense from a psychological standpoint as well. A harlot doesn't judge, because she herself is at the lowest step of society. And she definitely doesn't like the God of the Old Testament who condemned shameless harlotry in his commandments and prophecies. This is the thinking found in the cathorthodox church: a twisted perversion of the "we are all sinners" concept - a license to perform the worst acts of false worship under the guise of mercy. People experience pleasure from fornicating with Rome because she is just so dirty and androgyne! "The love of God to the full" in the above Leadbeater quote just means - perverted sex without any restraints like what you get with a prostitute yet here it is spiritual. A pleasure produced by union with all kinds of demons. With Rome you get the equivalent of a dirty-talking Linda Fiorentino, not the timid Shirley Temple. The Apostle John was amazed at the sight because women are not supposed to be provocative and aggressive. |

The Harlot is such a perversion of a Biblical Church that you can't be indifferent... unless you are already fornicating with her.... like 95% of evangelicals!! And they just don't seem to get it that the Mass is the ultimate perversion of the gospel. Just goes to show that a total normalization of spiritual whoredom has been achieved. (not so different from how fleshly/mundane whoredom and prostitution have been normalized)

This shameless, filthy spirit however is most wrong in one thing. As any stereotypical seductress, she is under the delusion that she can have any man. Or keep any man. Or quench the anger of any man. But in the end, the Lord will never be hers. And the kings of the world, while currently enamored with her, can start hating her in the snap of the fingers. And so her erotomania will be found out when the nations of the world themselves destroy her, after seeing her powerless before the judgments of the Lord. She will be unable to prevent his coming wrath (in 7 cups).... and that will seal her fate. Jealousy, combined with contempt, leads to murder. (Nahum 3:5). The saints will get their revenge.

==============================================

Personal experience of the writer may be of interest in this connection. About 1948 or 1949, the writer acted as a part-time assistant to a Roman Catholic prelate in Austria, Abbot Alois Wiesinger, O.Cist., who was writing a book on occult phenomena. While perusing the abbot's files he discovered a drawing prepared some years before by a rural seer, representing a form clairvoyantly perceived by the seer every time the Mass was said in the village church. Some six or seven years later the writer discovered a representation of the "Eucharistic edifice" in Leadbeater's book. It matched the Austrian one in eerie detail! Moreover, the chances of an illiterate Alpine peasant ever having encountered Leadbeater's book are very small. That two persons of such different characters should have perceived the same structure of magical forces in the Eucharist is evidence that cannot be easily dismissed.

But this magical attitude toward the Mass must be kept in bounds also. People may be tempted to participate in it in order to take a sort of "astral shower bath" while neglecting the devotion that is required to receive sacramental grace.

 

C.G. Jung and the Mass

That great modern representative of the Gnosis, C.G. Jung, had a great interest in the Christian sacraments, particularly in the Mass. He repeatedly stated that he considered Catholicism a far more complete religion than its Protestant counterparts. The mystery of the sacraments, said Jung, had great value, and produced a degree of psychological health among Catholics that was not found among Protestants and atheists. (One wonders whether he would have made the same statement about the post-Vatican II church, with its folk Masses and burlap vestments.)

Jung contended that the Eucharistic sacrifice contained a vital mystery that was not entirely negated by the dogmatic structure in which it was veiled:

The ritual act [of the Mass] consecrates both the gift and the givers. It commemorates and represents the Last Supper which our Lord took with His disciples, the whole Incarnation, Passion, Death and Resurrection of Christ. But from the point of view of the divine, this anthropomorphic action is only the outer shell of husk in which what is really happening is not a human action at all but a divine event. ¹

Jung emphasizes that those involved in the celebration of the Mass are ministering causes of the divine event. The priest does not cause the mystery; he is merely a minister of grace and power. The same is true of the congregation and of the seemingly inert substances of bread and wine. The Mass is not an action executed by humans, but by divinity.

To revert to magical terminology once again, there are two main categories of magic. Low magic is personalistic and egotistical: It envisions its operators as the causes of magical acts. But when humans become the ministering agents of divinity, having mystically sensed that divinity wants to manifest itself through humanity, then we are dealing with high magic.

According to Jung, the Mass, when properly understood, is best treated as an act of high magic. In this regard he wrote:

Wherever the [low] magical aspect of a rite tends to prevail, it brings the rite nearer to satisfying the individual ego's blind greed for power, and thus breaks up the mystical body of the Church into separate units. Where on the other hand, the rite is conceived as the action of God himself, the human participants have only an incidental or "ministering" significance.²

Jung does go on to state that the lesser, human consciousness, symbolized by the priest and the congregation, is confronted with a situation that is independent of human action. Divinity and its sacrificial mystery exist on a plane that is timeless and transcends consciousness as humans know it. It impels the human being to act as a minister of grace by making him an exponent, in time and among humanity, of an event that is timeless and divine.

Jung's attitude differs, commendably, I believe, from the prosaic, humdrum interpretation offered by rationalizing theologians, who reduce this sublime mystery to the trivial proportions of their own thinking. It also differs from the arrogance of some New Age teachers, who insist upon humans "creating their own reality."

Humility in the face of transcendence; this is Jung's great characteristic as a man, and it is also his advice to us. "The hammer cannot discover within itself the power which makes it strike," as he remarked in the essay quoted above. What seizes the human being in the mystery of the Mass or in any other mystery is something outside humanity: a sovereign power, as free from limitation as light is from darkness. Ordinary human consciousness cannot find anything within itself that would cause humans to perform a mystery. It can only do so when it is seized by the mystery.

The human soul is at once near and far from the divine. On the one hand we are all suffering from the great alienation, the great estrangement; yet there also dwells within is a portion of the free and eternal one who is forever united with all that is holy, great, and good throughout the aeons of aeons. The dazzling spark of the divine lives in the outermost darkness. When viewed from without, it appears clothed in darkness, having assumed some of the likeness of this darkness. The Gnostic myth declares that the sparks of our indwelling divinity have come forth from a central flame, and that they partake of two aspects: They have the quality of "sparks" (separateness) and of "flames" (union) at the same time. (This recognition is in fact the central idea behind the much-discussed Gnostic "dualism.")

In addition to the views of the mass discussed above, there is also the notion that this mystery is of the nature of a sacrifice. The sacrifice, in its Gnostic sense, involves the return of the alienated spark to its original flame. Neither philosophy, metaphysics, nor dogma can accomplish this longed-for union, for it is not a matter of concept but of experience. If we wish to join our shining twin in heaven by removing the dichotomy, we must do a work, an opus, as the alchemists of old would have called it. We must offer the bread and wine of our lesser nature to a power from above, so that this human self may be transformed into the likeness and indeed the substance of the wholly other, the alien God, the One beyond and above all the aeons, who in some utterly mysterious way is still our own, true, inmost Self. God in man returns to himself in the sacrificial mystery. As Jung expressed it:

The dichotomy of God into divinity and humanity and his return to himself in the sacrificial act hold out the comforting doctrine that in man's own darkness there is hidden a light that shall once again return to its source, and that this light actually wanted to descend into the darkness in order to deliver the Enchained One who languishes there, and lead him to light everlasting.³

This return is not an act that can ever be performed by the lesser human consciousness. This lesser self can only offer itself as an instrument, an offering on the eucharistic altar of Gnosis. Words cannot describe, thoughts cannot penetrate, senses cannot perceive the true character of the mysterium tremendum et fascinans (awesome and bewitching mystery) enacted on the altar. Only the still mind, the reverent emotion, and the pure will directed toward the goal of divine union can bring us closer to the secret that blazes forth at the center of the mystery. Myths may bring us nearer, magic may illuminate, philosophy may elucidate, but the mystery remains, as it must, for it is in us and we are in it.

	The Cruets (below) contain the sacramental wine and water. The Ciborium (right) is a covered chalice which holds the hosts (sacramental bread) that are distributed to the congregation. The Chalice (left) is the cup in which the priest consecrates the wine during the Mass.

Pope was at the base of the pyramid/triangle in Sofia too

 Like in Trieste where he flew with his white Ibis to "heal democracy", the pope/thoth/hermes/"the healer" was situated near the southernmost point of the triangle in his visit to Sofia in 2019. This triangle represents a pyramid with magical functions. I have discovered further connections between the triangle and Thoth, Osiris and the Pyramids, but too busy to post. Angular pyramids have been the most arrogant rebellion of man against God after the tower of Babel - a structure made impossible to topple. A man buried inside, hidden from the wrath of God, to be revived through magic. A sort of an anti-ark.

Also, there are a lot of references to Alchemy/Apophis/Apep/Sin-eater and Ukraine in the occult jesuit movie "The Order" 2003. Will post if I have time and energy. My health has deteriorated to the point that I am almost disabled.

One earth, one faith - part 3 - an icon that is worth a 1000 gnostic words

 

At first glance one is tempted to ask "what am I looking at". The conservative simple (I call them simple not in the good sense of simple-minded or simple-hearted, but rather they are fools foaming at the mouth at liberals) will quickly jump and say "Look - Black Jesus!". However this image doesn't have anything to do with skin color, but rather is an occult signal that a part of a grand plan is under way - a part to replace the historical, come-in-the-flesh masculine Jesus, with a new one....

Not coincidentally the pope made a cryptic and confusing message about a mission already underway in Ukraine:

Earlier this month, he stated that the Vatican was working on a peace plan to end the war, saying that the mission was "not yet public. When it is public, I will talk about it."

Ukraine war: Pope tells Zelensky he is 'praying for peace'

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65581170

 

 Lets look at the gnostic/alchemic Christ and how he is supposed to replace the "child that has caused wars and grief to humanity".

"The purpose of christianity was to exalt the woman..... Everyone must give birth to their own savior. These wars - they are a part of the old way of thinking.... people will change.

Take the mother" - the mother - this is the contradiction which causes us to think
In Hebrew M means death. Death has two processes in nature. One destroys, the other - builds up. You cant build, if you haven't destroyed first. These two processes work together in nature and THOUGHT (one of the names of Sophia <protennoia>) occurs by them.

Mary is the woman who walks around, destroys and purifies everything. She has given birth to a child and has destroyed the works of men; and this child has caused them great trouble. Do you know how many have died because of this child? So many go to war because of him... So Mary who gave birth to a child, caused humanity grief. Therefore she wants to purify, uproot everything and plant something new, and when Christ comes, the angel says: "Go to Egypt" And "Egypt" is the physical world. This child must go to Egypt to learn.....

The child - this is the (new) reality. This is the human "I". The new man. If you don't comprehend the new in yourself, you have no new man. We say of Christ that he is sent by God, but Christ is just a symbol or an ideal for man, for the divine that will be born in every soul. The soul will be the mother, she will give birth to a child. There will be no childless people. The childless will be sentenced to death. Your mother and father are your inner oneness. The father and mother are at one place. Your inner voice is the father. And all the people around us are our mother."

- from the speech 'The theotokos is the mother with her heart'  by Petar Deunov, commissioned by the jesuits in Boston

In the jaws of pontic enemies - part 2 - "A bridge to nowhere"

 A certain part of Avles' latest post served as the missing piece in a small puzzle I've been looking at for a while:

Above image - the Kerch bridge is the first target of the Storm Shadow cruise missiles. Until now Ukraine was denied of any weapon with such an operative range

THE KERCH "BRIDGE": true reason of why just now, 11th May, to announce its possible destruction (Storm Shadow)

This is highly symbolic, a Jesuit-masonic allegory.... The pope of Rome is the "builder of bridges", aka "pontifex" in LATIN.... The Kerch Bridge is an allegory of "another" builder of bridges, a Slavonic Orthodox one.... The pope of Rome is a jealous pope, he cannot stand another competitor... Only Rome has to be the "builder" of bridges between people, nations, sects, cults, etc....

FROM:

May 11th

https://spirithismouth.blogspot.com/2023/05/may-11th.html?sc=1683884011964#c9151776929118665879

 

 The Kerch bridge and the Toman peninsula all lie on the 37th Meridian:

Now, with that in mind, lets return to Boston, where the jesuit-gnostic movie The Equalizer was filmed.
In one of the scenes, the protagonist "Rob", a hero-at-night character who makes it his mission to "save" a teenage prostitute from her Russian captors/pimps, converses with the said prostitute in a cafe called "Bridge diner"

Now, as he meets her, the conversation steers to her bleak future and he provides the recipe for a good future by telling her to "change her world". In this case - to get out of the "Russian world" (world = mir).

Magnificent bridge above Robert's head.
As they leave the diner, they cross the "Andrew P. McArdle Memorial Bridge" and go into East Boston on MERIDIAN STREET. St Andrew is the patron saint of  Russia.....

 

 

As they cross over to East Boston, near the Mobil gas station (which country was called a "gas station with rockets"?), the pimp/villain Slavi - I must insist that this is a name that you will never find in Russia, only in my country, but was put for the totality of the slavic world, - gets out of a car and molests and threatens Alina.

The script behind the screenplay is clear: Going EAST through the SLAVIC bridge into the RUSSIAN world means being a perpetual slave under Machistic Autocrats (Mafiosos).

 

One third more or less (wedging in the Trinity)

(warning, strong language)

The doctrine of God is of utmost importance to one's personal theology. Now, what, may one ask, is the doctrine of God of those who run the whole charade? Lets start in Egypt (our favorite destination):

A hymn from Esna states that Neith fashions the world “in her form of Goddess who reaches to the limits of the universe, in her material form of the liquid surface, in her name of unlimited duration,” (Esna, vol. 5, p. 111); “the extension of the water which makes eternity [heh],” “the stream which fashions everlastingness [djet],” (ibid., p. 114 n. i). Neith’s independence and autonomy are emphasized in her demiurgic activity. Thus it is often said that Neith is both feminine and masculine – “two thirds masculine, one third feminine,” (Esna, vol. 5, p. 110) – both mother and father, “who inaugurated birth when birth had not yet been,” (Lichtheim, vol. 3, p. 38), having “appeared from herself,” (Esna, vol. 5, p. 253). The primordial register in which Neith’s cosmogonic activity occurs can be seen from the fact that, in the version from Esna, Neith brings forth both Re, the principle of cosmic order, and Apophis, the principle of entropy.

Neith was the male-female creator and represented the flow of time, matter. She was called the Queen of Heaven in the same fashion as Isis, and represented wisdom. Now, in this she was the archetype or the direct inspiration behind an interesting type of the gnostic Sophia. The Sethians were a particularly anti-Jehovah sect, and worshipped a compound deity called Barbelo, which, juxtaposed next to Neith, seems a direct "port" into the latter mystical religion. And it was not only the Sethians

THE DIVINE BARBELO

 

Another syncretic goddess of the Egyptian Gnostics is Barbelo. She resembles Khokhmah in her presentation as a divine emanation. The Sethian scripture Allogenes calls her “the first Arche of blessedness, the Aeon of Barbelo, full of divinity, and the first Arche of that one without Arche, the spiritual invisible Triple Power, the All that is higher than perfect.” [Arthur, 165] Many writers refer to Mother Barbelo as part of a trinity, along with the Father and Son. Here the Christian influence comes into view, but it is tempered by Egyptian themes: the trinity abides in the female sphere of the “Eighth.” [Pagels, 166; Arthur, 166] Epiphanius reports that the Gnostics placed Barbelo with Christ in the Eighth heaven. [Doresse, 43]

            Attempts to reconcile conflicting traditions results in contradictions in the Barbelo literature. The Gospel of the Egyptians says that Barbelo originated from herself, as the ancients had said of Neit, Mother of the Gods. But the Three Stelas of Seth represent her as “the first shadow of the holy Father,” who existed before her. Its author addresses her with feminine pronouns, but paradoxically praises her as “the male virginal Barbelo.”[Arthur, 165-6] A later passage reverts to goddess imagery:

 

Thou art a Sophia. Thou art a Gnosis. Thou art truth. Because of thee, there is life. Life is from thee. Because of thee, there is mind... Thou art a cosmos of truth.

Thou art a triple power... [Arthur, 166]

 

The Sethians said that this trinity was made up of Light, Breath, and Darkness. The Peratae had it as Father, Son and Matter, with the Son mediating between the exalted Father and a passive female principle. [Both according to the Philosophumena, in Doresse, 52, 50]

            But the Trimorphic Protennoia exalts “Barbelo, the perfect glory, and the immeasurable Invisible One who is hidden."  She is called Protennoia—Primal Thought—who "dwells in the Light," and from her originated a trinity of Father, Mother, Son. This scroll begins with an aretalogy that praises her as "the movement that dwells in the All...she who exists before the All."  [Trimorphic Protennoia, tr by John D. Turner, <www.gnosis.org/naghamm/trimorph.html>]

 

I move in every creature... I am the Invisible One within the All... It is I who poured forth the water. It is I who am hidden by radiant waters. It is I who gradually put forth the All by my Thought. It is I who am laden with the Voice. It is through me that Gnosis comes forth.” [Ibid]

 

Protennoia's connection with the waters recalls the primal flood of Neith and Isis, who brought forth the Nile inundation. And like both goddesses who were mothers of the sun, Neit to Ra and Isis to Horus, Protennoia proclaims, "I am the Womb that gives shape to the All by giving birth to the Light that shines in splendor. I am the Aeon to come. I am the fulfilment of the All, that is, Meirothea, the glory of the Mother." [Ibid check is this Arthur?]

            The Apochryphon of John contains another aretalogy of “the perfect Pronoia of the universe,” who was the First. She represents “the light which exists in light,” but wandered in the great darkness, “into the midst of the prison,” and the depths of the underworld. [not Arthur?, 132, 162-7] However, this book unfavorably compared “sister Sophia” to Barbelo. A splitting of Gnostic goddess images was underway, in the process of subordinating her to “the Father.” The Christian authors now disparaged the independence of a goddess not firmly partnered to a male god. These  derivative Gnostic aretalogies reflect an emerging concept of the “fallen” goddess.

            The longest aretalogy appears in Thunder, Perfect Mind, which follows the form of the old Isis litanies:

 

I am the first and the last.

I am the honored one and the scorned one.

I am the whore and the holy one.

I am the wife and the virgin

I am the mother and the daughter

I am the members of my mother

I am the barren one, and many are her sons....

I am the silence that is incomprehensible

And the idea whose remembrance is frequent

And the word whose appearance is multiple

I am the utterance of my name.

[Kurt Rudolph, Gnosis: The Nature and History of an Ancient Religion, 1984, in Long]

 

           

Further on there is a veiled but pointed reference to Isis: “I am the Sophia of the Greeks/ And the Gnosis of the barbarians/ I am one whose image is great in Egypt...” Unlike the pagan aretalogies, however, Thunder is dualistic, pairing negatives—”ignorance... shame... fear”—with Barbelo's divine qualities. [Arthur, 7, 164, 173-5. She reasons that Thunder was originally titled The Divine Barbelo, based on abbreviations and the association of Barbelo with the title "Perfect Mind."] Some of the lines in Thunder resemble verses in the “Song of the Woman” in the Origin of the World. This version attributes the song to Eve, assigning her a male lord not present in Thunder. In the Hypostasis of the Archons, similar declarations about Eve are put in Adam’s mouth. [Arthur, 162, 148]

"This is the first thought, his image; she became the womb of everything, for it is she who is prior to them all, the Mother-Father, the first man (Anthropos), the holy Spirit, the thrice-male, the thrice-powerful, the thrice-named androgynous one, and the eternal aeon among the invisible ones, and the first to come forth."

Anyone who has read the 8th chapter of the proverbs knows that Jesus is described as the Wisdom of God, the one set and anointed before all, the first emanation of God into the emptiness to create the worlds etc. The gnostic Sophia/Barbelo is an attempt to replace Christ in his creative, redemptive, eschatological roles etc with a all encompassing hermaphrodite (mother-father of good and evil).

 Barbelo was to be found in the 8th heaven alongside Jesus and was a hermaphroditic virginal being that created itself and directs the flow of time and matter in the age to come. What is interesting is that one of the groups that God despises and condemns in the Book of Revelation (which was left outside of the RCC and EO reading list) , the Nicolaitans, apparently also worshipped Barbelo.

She is noticed in several neighbouring passages of Epiphanius, who in part must be following the Compendium of Hippolytus, as is shown by comparison with Philaster (c. 33), but also speaks from personal knowledge of the Ophitic sects specially called "Gnostici" (i. 100 f.). The first passage is in the article on the Nicolaitans (i. 77 f.), but is apparently an anticipatory reference to their alleged descendants the "Gnostici" (77 A; Philast.). 

Barbelo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbelo

 In our discussion of the major demolition project of the jesuits to pull down the stern, separate, masculine image (and doctrines....and Bibles) of God, it was mentioned how the main blow to the traditional Biblical idea of God will come with

"Mary absorbing Jesus and His wrath completely and His Redemption and judicatory destruction becoming utterly meaningless."



.............."if she (Sophia/Eve) enters into him and he takes her to himself, death will no longer exist" .......

One earth, one faith - part 2 - Fossil fuels and fossil masculine Jesus

https://jesus-partisans-on-the-balkans.blogspot.com/2022/05/one-earth-one-faith-part-2-fossil-fuels.html#comment-form

So one way for her to "enter" is to make her a part of the trinity. Well, that already has been done in Pentecostalism and liberal theology where the Holy Spirit has been described as feminine. Which makes God one third woman. It is curious that there is a strand of theology in Roman Catholicism that admits Mary as part of the godhead. But even within broader RCC thought one can't escape the thought that Mary is elevated to godhood and made a representative of the Holy Spirit. A poll taken at a parish in Ireland showed that the majority of catholics think Mary should be considered a part of the trinity. The only divine work she has not been fully admitted yet is redemption. For now, she is 'only' the house of the trinity,  a dispenser or vessel of grace. But with the fifth dogma, she will be elevated as co-redemptrix etc... a title only applicable to Jesus, the God and Savior.

All this profanity and travesty of a hermaphrodite self-generating androgynous god was condemned in the Book of Revelation. Curiously, this book condemns both the gnostic Nicolaitans that are said to be attempting to infiltrate certain churches and a great Whore church that is the result of that infiltration. And curiously, the Whore suffers plagues very reminiscent of the ones against Egypt with their river and water goddess Neith - the one the Nicolaitans went on to call Barbelo (Spiritually the new city is called Egypt). Even more shockingly, the phrase "one third" and rivers and waters (symbol of Neith) seem to feature prominently in the description of the plagues:

 Revelation 8:7 The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with blood, and they were cast upon the earth: and the third part of trees was burnt up, and all green grass was burnt up.
Revelation 8:8 And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood;
Revelation 8:9 And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed.

 In the Book of Exodus the first plague is directed against Neith - one of the deities of the river Nile.

The 1st plague was directed against the Nile itself, which the Egyptians worshipped as their source of life. This plague confronted the numerous river deities, including Khnum (guardian of the Nile), Hapi (spirit of the Nile and god of fertility) and Osiris (god of the underworld, whose blood the Nile was considered to be). By turning the Nile into blood and killing the fish (supposedly protected by Hathor and Neith), Moses was not only shaming all these Egyptian objects of worship, but also showing that sustenance comes only from the hand of Yahweh.

The ten plagues of Egypt

https://creation.com/the-ten-plagues-of-egypt

  

Now, I will not attempt to treat the nature and fulfillment of the plagues here - the link is what is important. Later on, the devil is said to drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth. The Nicolaitans are said to come from Nicholas, one of the first seven deacons of the church. Seven can't be divided by three, but if we recollect that Stephen was martyred, we are left with 6 men. This must mean that Nicholas was not alone in his apostasy - one of the remaining six could have been "dragged down" by Satan as well. Since the Nicolaitans were called so after Nicholas and there is a gnostic work that goes by the gospel of Philip, it is easy to assume that the apostle Philip or some disciple of his was the other protoapostate. However, this is completely in the mists of speculation and since the Bible testifies of Philip as being tested and led by the Holy Spirit, it is rather unlikely. This much we know about the link.

One can't help but wonder if the next entity in the male-male-female trinity line is some masculinized Mary or an effeminated Christ, or both. Seeing that the spiritual Egyptians are preparing for a grand return on the world stage, the gender equalizing must be more than visible, it must be the highlight contour of this grand re-entrance of the real "god". To wedge in the Trinity might just be more damning than to replace it altogether. After all, God does not like to share his glory with another. Which was what Satan has been trying to do ever since Noah's sons populated the world.