Free willism - partial reply to cryptocatholic post N7

Since I have been called to a discussion in a somewhat less cynical tone, I reply quick-handedly to the post. :

Calvi-nuts 7 --- the Calvinist hallucinations on "world" and "whole"

ttps://spirithismouth.blogspot.com/2025/08/calvi-nuts-7-calvinist-hallucinations.html

>............................

 If that governor would say that he saved the WHOLE community (or the "world") of dead walking men in the state prison, because he saved only ONE (or just only few of them), that governor should be at least impeached because affected by a serious mental disturbance and unable to carry on his duty as representative of the  people's will.

 Much worse would it be for the governor to boast that he has saved all, to the last person, in a literal sense and then left 99% of their comatose or on the other hand resisting bodies on the ground at the last step of the building, saying they made their decision to stay and die. Considering he has men strong enough to carry their bodies or even pick them up if they are unwilling and resisting. That is the pinnacle of cynicism and hypocrisy. But, as a man's god is, so is he. Hence the hypocrisy of Billy Graham, Hal Lindsey etc free will preachers who led very different lives to what they presented. Trust me, I know it from someone in the kitchen.


The god of the arminians is a hypocrite, being all powerful and claiming to have saved and to wish to save everyone, while not doing it. Wile the God of the calvinists is accused of.... unfairness for sending people to hell for their sins (and not giving them "a chance"). Well, their attitude towards the gospel shows that even if there was such a thing as universal salvation, they would reject it. But election is the most uncomfortable truth for the flesh. Perhaps this discomfort it gives free willers causes them to be so cynical and scornful.

Running away from the ethnic context is futile. God's election from an unimaginably increased scope - the multitude of nations outside of Israel -  was already a miracle and a huge scandal, even before talking about numbers. Remember that the Jews were scandalized by the fact that God visited the Gentiles and that only Naaman and the widow of Sarepta were helped at the time of Elijah. We are talking about a handful of people here.

Therefore God predestinated some to be saved the most to be damned just only because He isn't able to bring the Gospel to the Inuit in the age of emperor Nero ? But God is not unfair like the Calvinist God, he provided EVERYONE a means of salvation and he shut the mouth of the predestinationist with:

 

This Italian loves his Roman Catholicism so much! I wouldn't be surprised that in a year or two he sings mass and deletes his blog. Other ways to heaven outside of Jesus Christ? Almost sounds like pope Francis' atheists going to heaven. In reality, there is never a hint in Scripture of God owing humanity or any sinner a chance of salvation. That is taking the side of sinful flesh and saying hell by itself is unfair. It is also patently false that anyone can be saved apart from faith in Christ or the promises related to him. Those without Christ will never see life. Peter makes it clear the OT saints were saved by the grace of God and that there is no other way to heaven under heaven outside of the name (salvation) of Jesus Christ. And since God kept his word in motion only in Israel for over 1400 years, it is foolish to argue that there was no elective purpose. God definitely isn't a regional deity, but his purposes were and are very particular. Romans 2 is about regenerated persons. Unregenerated flesh means sin and breaking of the law. Or we must admit a better nature in some sinners contra Romans 1-3 and Ephesians 1-2.

This is for all the people who never heard the Gospel. Do you think God is so stupid just in order to fit the Calvinist nut-dreams ?

"EXCLUDED": And then, why not ?  Isn't God a predestinationist ? [by hypothesis] .... If He has decided the majority of the world population is lost without hope, why to send to them the Gospel ? 

The author asks why would God send the gospel to those who are already saved. Well, isn't it fair to ask why would he send the gospel to these law abiding gentiles, if they are already being saved by their law keeping? (if we assume like dispensationalists they are unregenerate yet saving themselves in the first place). Isn't it much worse, considering how many actually reject it?

But the gospel is exactly the revelation of eternal life/salvation etc to the elect. It doesn't care about reprobates. The ones who excused themselves from the supper, were left without hope. The others were compelled and without the compulsion of God's drawing love, nobody would come to know. Know what? Our life, hidden in Christ before the foundation of the world. To see our names, written in heaven. To the non elect the gospel is a stench of death, a closed door, a perpetural rejection, a final doom. Same way temptation is the unveiling of already present realities. I realize this takes out the excitement of unexpected twists and turns, but we have the WWE wrestling or Soap Operas for that. In the mind of God all is already done.  Jesus was a stumblingblock for Israel, to reveal what was already in their hearts and pronounce the corresponding juidgment which included a hardening that made them totally intolerant of him and his doctrine.

The knowledge of salvation is knowing your personal salvation which must be already there. Anything else is airy universalism and of no use. One can trump a universal salvation all day, without a man seeing his own share/interest, he will never get saved. But the free willer methods seek to convince people they are saved when they were never born again or been elrected. By giving them something to do on their part. But, you see how God removes any human agency and influence by placing salvation in eternity past:

Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began,

Now, why rather not say: "Given the world before the world began"? It would be a beautiful, emphatic sentence. Because here the world is used in the absolute sense and it would be a contradiction and absurdity to affirm that salvation has been given to the entire world. It was only given to us, the elect. Like in 2 Peter 3:9. Like in John 17.

Unfortunately, after the pattern of all IFBS and especially Ruckmanites, Edoardo thinks bombastically paradoxical, emotionally loaded statements are truths. But they are fitting for orators and politicians.We should stick to Scripture. 

"We are the world (of John 3:16), we are the children (of God)" .... and we have no choice to make AMEN

 Free willists can't provide a good reason as to why ALL MEN or simply ALL shouldn't be taken in an absolute sense ("without exception") in any of the following verses. The weight of the proof is on them, as they claim that these words must be used the same way throughout Scripture. Evidently, they are not. They are used differently in different contexts and, in fact, the absolute meaning is VERY rarely used. There are a whole lot of these non absolute verses. I have only presented two.


And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

Evidently the Eskimos, the Indians, the Japanese and many others, together with the rejectors, as well as all people who died without hearing these tidings, are EXCLUDED.

Ye are our epistle written in our hearts, known and read of all men:

According to the free willers, the Eskimos, the Indians, the Japanese and many others were spectators of Paul's ministry. But it is evidently false.

The ethnic meaning of the "world" in John 3 and 1 John 2:2:

And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for our's only, but also for the sins of the whole world.


For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

The darkened, reprobate mind of the free willer cannot comprehend that the Lord Jesus teaches the jews two particular lessons here. First, the gentiles are included in the conenant, to the surprise of Nicodemus. Jesus told him this because Nicodemus had to realize that the whole formal Jewish religion was in error - God's salvation and judgment were not ethnic or biased - never were. God's salvation was multi-ethnic AND supernatural, so not according to the human tribalistic understanding of the fleshly israelites. God would individually call in his sheep and not usher the end times until all have been gathered. He would start by taking out some jews out of their generation, as Peter preached in Jerusalem. And he would finish with taking some out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation; (Rev 5:9).

As the song goes, "we are the world, we are the children". Yet.... we have no choice to make. 

The error of the jews was to believe that God had chosen only them, that he had to choose only them.... but he maintains his right to choose and beget as we learn in John 1:13 and John 3:8. To the dismay of the demonically inspired free willer mind, these verses only teach one thing - absolute Divine Sovereignty. God had not sent his Christ to judge the heathen but to save many of his ELECT sheep among them, according to his plan. The "no exceptions" of John 3:16 has nothing to do with individuals and a lot to do with "yes to inclusion of other nations" and the immediate issues obscuring that - the Roman+barbarian influence and oppression over Israel which had made the Jews full of self-righteousness, and their demanding attitude towards God who maintains his right to choose and had a totally different plan for a "chosen nation". Jesus warned the jews that rebellion will ALSO lead to the loss of the external kingdom and ministry.... and that is what happened. Because his warnings were much more of a prophecy than mere warnings. The Scriptures had to be fulfilled in order for the forewritten in the book of the lamb to be gathered.


1 John was written primarily to jews. This again gives an ethnic context. The key here is consolation. 1 John 2:2 was written to encourage and console jewish sinners that God has redeemed even the worst of the gentiles -  disgusting human beings who engaged in vile carnal acts and base idolatry. What consolation and encouragement could 1 John 2:2 give if it simply means a potential salvation of the entire world - none. Jesus dying for every Indian, Eskimo and Japanese would have absolutely no relevance to the ancient jew. However, Jesus dying for a type of gentile they intimately knew and thought was beyond salvation - the vile Greek, Phoenician, Roman, Sarmatian etc.... would make a lot of sense. The Roman world was regularly juxtaposed with the righteous jew. Hence, gentiles were considered characterized by open sin (as in Galatians 2:15). There lies the consolation and purpose of the verse.

But the self-righteous madness of the free willer is such that he doesn't recognize the plan and purposes of God. For him, the words of the Bible mean nothing and God is a purposeless and careless madman, leaving to devilish mankind to perform his highest desire - knowing full well that is something they would never do. . . The free willer does all this in the name of the idol called "self" and his superior choice in "getting saved." That's why so many of his interpretations of the most important books of the Bible are profane and superficial. He sees no glory in the works of God. But the election, salvation and praise belong to God. Our salvation was accomplished at the cross. Faith in the gospel only uncovers it.

 

Free will - the backbone of marian theology

 

Freewillism is hidden hatred towards Jesus Christ

 There is a very good reason the jesuits have been fighting TOTAL DEPRAVITY which necessitates ELECTION. Because anything else than humanity being "a bad tree" and God "a good tree" will surely lead in the opposite direction. If we admit the possibility of goodness in man, this automatically means there is a possibility of unrighteousness in God. And from there it is a VERY short way to denying the cross and the judgment of God. Do you really believe God has sent his Son for beings who can alter their nature? Or that God "offers" his Son like a travelling merchant? Rather the gospel is a proclamation of the salvation of the elect. That's it! The elect embrace it and rejoice. The rest get worse or devise a conversion in which they have "made the right choice". God does not owe sinful humanity anything. Much less a chance at salvation. One must either side with sinful humanity and devise ways to justify it without the cross or make it "saveable" like the arminians (but most prefer the former).... or take the hard route/the narrow road of particular redemption and regeneration preceding or concurrent with faith. Which one is it going to be? Sinful flesh - or the Son of God?

Jesus Christ never died for the feminine free will she-goats

 John 10:11
I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.

Galatians 3:13
Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us:


MATTHEW 25:33,41
And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.
Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:


All believers in universal love and free will are infected with a feminine demon which teaches them a false love that lullabies the whole world to death and hell. And that is completely fine, because God doesn't love these people, nor the world as a whole. This post, like every warning in Scripture is written more as a declaration, than a call of repentance. If you look underneath the surface level distinctions, there is no difference between free willism and universalism. In fact, in the Anglo world universalism was always preceded by a fall from predestinationism to universal love teaching. Universal love is the bottom of the sea where the useless vessels are thrown out of the kingdom of God (Matthew 13).


Satanic Origen was too smart to miss the logical outcome of the doctrine of free will - the final (after a pedagogic cleansing) salvation of every rational being. Today's free willists aren't. They are both naive and disingenuous. They are blind leading the blind. The false love teaching has plunged the world into an apostasy and a moral catastrophe, thanks to the jesuits and their faithful servants like Spurgeon, James Stewart, Billy Graham, Ruckman etc. There is a reason why in Europe 80% of arminian baptists reverted to Catholicism after the counter-reformation and why Huguenots and predestinarian baptists like the Waldenses had to be killed or driven away. Because arminianism is the gateway to Catholicism and calvinism is the antidote against it.

For these people their own predetermined salvation is impossible because it truly doesn't exist. The Spirit of God doesn't testify to them that they are saved so they deny that he has saved anyone (read 1 John 5). They say that "He has done his part". That is why they imagine another type of universal, conditional  salvation where they cannot be excluded and they can demonstrate their "goodness" too. And they pretend to fulfill with their free will the conditions of repentance and faith (which are actually gifts) and stand out of the crowd.

This is similar to the spirit of feminism and the mode of operation of modern western women who can't handle a real traditional man and so, to save face, imagine that their loneliness is a result of their ability to choose.... so they seek a perfect little puppy - a subservient genie who is all love and cuddles and respects their every choice, and they surround themselves with equally vain and stupid people. Sounds familiar? It is the same with the unchosen arminians and their puny little god and their progressive crowds of hobby christians. IT IS NOT A COINCIDENCE THAT FEMINISM AND FREE WILLISM EXPLODED IN THE END OF THE 19TH CENTURY. THE SIGNAL WAS GIVEN BY SATAN.The first president of the Southern Baptist Convention preached his last sermon on Election and Predestination just before he died in 1886. In September 1889, the Wyoming state convention ratified a state constitution that included a provision granting voting rights to female citizens. One year later Wyoming was admitted to the union, formally making it the first state to grant women the right to vote

No matter what they believe about themselves, no matter how sentimental and falsely loving they seeom or consider themselves to be, they remain goats who are blind to the work of God as it does not pertain to them. That is why the goats only see their own works (Matthew 25). This is the origin of anti calvinism, which has descended into ravening madness. This is why only 1-2% of evangelicals believe in predestination. Because only 1-2% of evangelicals understand and believe that salvation is 100% of the Lord. Because these 1-2% are the few chosen.


The goat is a much sturdier/durable animal than the sheep. Likewise goat christians are much more self-reliant for the simple reason that God has left them to themselves. They don't need much food, much bible doctrine. It also has serpentine eyes and straight horns and a tail. This straightness is a symbol of the main characteristic of the goat christian - he is deceptive as a snake, dangerous and self-righteous. Of course, goats are much more prone to wander away and lose themselves....they also destroy trees and shrubs which points to the destructive nature of goat christians in the christian churches. They are so destructive that they have turned fruitful christian churches into sodomite dens in the span of one century. They are killers of true christian devotion which is based on the proper concept of God.
 
The fact that free willers believe they can peddle God's love like hot pancakes, the fact that they condemn faithful christians with the harshest words and give the benefit of the doubt to every pentecostal, charismatic and "baptist" just shows that they have anti-faith and anti-love, created by this feminine spirit that ever opposes the right and pejorative of God in much the same way feminism is on a hell inspired mission to destroy man's rightful and natural supremacy.

But the universal charity aimed at in this work, is that pretended love of erroneous professors, who are contending for the salvation of all the world, and disputing against the sovereignty of God, and against his word in the behalf of them. Surely if this spirit came from God, it would never cavil against his sovereign will.

The Saviour rebuked this in Peter, as coming from the devil; "Get thee behind me, Satan; thou art an offence unto me; for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men," Matt. xvi 33. Thus the Saviour shews that every spirit which takes the part of flesh and blood, and rebels against the will of God, is from the devil himself.

I fear that some have been so strenuous for universal, that they have neglected particular redemption. Every man that is saved must experience redemption for himself; it must be known by every particular sheep of the Saviour's fold. Universal redemption will afford but little comfort to one in rebellion against God, condemned by his own conscience, and who never was purged from his guilt, nor redeemed from his vain conversation. Thus redemption becomes particular to every chosen vessel: nor can it ever be proved to be universal, until we have gotten the universal testimony of every man in the world having received it; which I see no likelihood of at present.

The Arminian Skeleton

William Huntington 1745-1813

http://www.williamhuntington.net/Works/Volume02/02001.htm

The perpetual objectors of the eternal decrees of Romans 9

 Romans 9 isn't about "loving less"

Context determines the meaning. Later in the chapter we read about those who are put alongside Esau:

22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:

If Romans 9 was talking only about loving less, there would be no grounds for objection and blasphemy. Humanity simply wouldn't be able to blame God of being unrighteous. Paul would directly follow up with an explanation of the exact meaning. But they do, and they do it to this day, because it seems unrighteous from the sinful perspective of man who considers himself worthy of eternal love.

However, Paul circumvents the whole discussion of worthiness and unworthiness and takes us to eternity past, where God has taken a decision to spare some and destroy others. The fixed states of eternity depend entirely upon the fixed attitude of God towards different individuals. The only reason someone might object against salvific election is that they themselves, like Cain, bear the token of wrath against themselves and remain in their evil nature where they hold the truth in unrighteousness. This grudge can't be resolved with arguments because it arises from the deep seated hatred and feeling of unworthiness of the ones that experience and feel the true hatred of God against the reprobates.

The reason a person can't be convinced that God loves only the elect is the same as the reason one can't be forced against his conscience to believe that God loves him in particular if the wrath of God works upon his conscience. Of course arminians have perfected the evil art of negating conscience and very rapidly and rashly convincing people that God loves them - even without repentance, conversion, love of the Word of God etc. to boost their "soul winning" numbers. But they are not successful for long.
This tactic has led to the creation of millions of reprobates who think they are in God's favor while having no work of God in their hearts. Hundreds of years ago in evangelical Britain this deception was called "presumption" and was understood for what it is - a self-righteous lulling to death caused by never actually heeding Jesus Christ's call for repentance and faith.

Today, American "christians" bear the poisonous fruit of this delusion - they are rabid animals, living devils without a noble bone in their bodies. As are their imitators/followers who only spew hate against Europe and the doctrines of their fathers. But Scripture has warned us against mockers and scoffers.

the scorner is an abomination to men. - Proverbs 24:9

That is why so many of these American pseudochristians are hated all over the world - not because of the gospel, but because of their foolish, arrogant behavior.

As for "Love your enemies" the solution is simple. Temporal mercy, shown to the ungodly can be considered love, yet it is not the same kind of love that is shown towards the elect. God draws and converts those who he loves with eternal love:

Jeremiah 31:3
The LORD hath appeared of old unto me, saying, Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee.

John 6:44
No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

If God loved everyone with this love they would all be eventually converted and, furthermore, he would have no actual enemies from his eternal perspective. God can't be blamed for eternally or even temporally hating most of humanity, however we can and will be blamed for temporally hating humanity for the simple reason that we are at the level of this same humanity and are not positioned high above, at the top of the endless difference/distance between creature and Creator. Hence, loving our neighbor which is to say those who are like us, of the same nature. This way Romans 9:20 can shut the mouth of the creature which feels left out of God's favor while the gospel can shut the mouth of the creature which wants to hate its fellow creatures Luke 10:29.

The commandment to love every neighbor perfectly is in place and will be in place till the end the world. God shows mercy and is benevolent towards even his most vile enemies. Adam betrayed the entire human race with unfathomable hatred, but the man Jesus Christ gives us an unfathomable (for hateful humanity) love and sets us to do good in our human affairs. Indeed Christ has died for only some and we are bound to love all, but the fact is that even if he died for only one evil sinner, the example would be just as bright and sufficient. Unless the Devil wants a quota or makes it mandatory for Christ to die for every single person. Which is exactly what arminians are doing and thus are voiding the gospel of its infinite value and wonderfulness.

 Dispensationalism doesn't solve the issue but rather makes it worse for it presents an even more unpredictable and selective God. After all, if we are to blame God for not choosing some in the New Testament, why shouldn't we blame him for destroying the first world or not extending the waiting period to the lifespan at the time (120 vs 800-900yrs). What is the basis of ignoring one for the other? Why not blame him for all kinds of destruction at every time? But he is righteous in all his ways. Indeed, the issue here is not this or that destruction of these or those people but that faced with this doctrine  which searches hearts the objector has found himself outside of election and inside of destruction and persists in his evil murmuring.

The right triangle

UPDATE at the bottom 26.08.2024.


The moral catastrophe of America can be traced to the rejection of the doctrines of grace and the removal of the KJB. It is not a coincidence that ONLY the KJB baptists stubbornly retain some tiny leftovers of grace doctrine - "eternal security". But just like the half-race child hates one of its parental races, KJB only baptists hate calvinism. Because they can't get rid of it.

 One of the higher forms of satanism is free willism - to give the glory to man, instead of God. This is the religion of  Origen, Erasmus, John Wesley (who believe in sinless perfecrtiron) the Orthodox church, the Jesuits, the Mormons, and every liberal denomination of the world. Synergism. The idea that man helps God even 0.0000001% in salvation. This is the reason Jesuits have absolutely no interest in stopping evangelicalism in the USA - it is their creation that continues to deceive the world that their faith should rest on an imagined Universal love, instead of the accomplishing love of finished Redemption which changes man. All free will preachers have been doing is create the apostate base of the neo-Egyptian pyramid by letting in people who are not regenerate. I challenge anyone to find a major liberal denomination that believes in predestination. 90% of baptist churches in the USA were predestinarian before 1880.  

He who answers a matter before he hears it—this is folly and disgrace to him


 Do not be deceived. The children of God are not born of the will of man or flesh and do not hate anyone (James 1:15, John 1:13). There is only an elect remnant.  Again, it is usual for free willists to pre-emptively attack the children of God with the accusation of "pride". Yet the truly proud is the person who thinks he was smart enough to make the right choice, unlike his neighbor, even if you call it intuition etc. But pride is not hidden to God.



***********************************************************************

And now, things that are more uncertain and unclear. As already mentioned, the temple of Mary/Hathor in Trieste is composed of triangles (excluding the whole structure which is a capless pyramid - on that later). 

Now, the triangles are extremely important in esoteric traditions, but we will again go the classics. The ridiculous obsession of the human costumes of the demon rulers of this world with triangles can be seen in the Novus Ordo Seclorum blog:

........Above image – and do you pretend that I too give to you explanations??? No, instead I am the one to make questions, to you. Tell me now please who is the true psychopath: Anders Breivik or centuries of serial psychopath who silently planned this masterwork of Romish universal evilness?

Now you understand why to live in this city and its surroundings is like to live in the Land of Damned Souls, or in the movie "The Body Snatcher", a fact that if you don't have a firm Faith, can easily push you in a depressive state with suicidal tendencies. Guaranteed. I forgot: also for this geometry,  this is only the beginning.

Spider's web of Rome 2°: A "retired triangle"

https://novoordoseclorum.blogspot.com/2012/04/spiders-web-of-rome-2-retired-triangle.html

Plato described the world as consisting of triangles, not tangible elements.

While there is so much that can be said about angular and triangular occulitsm, one thing is urgent now.
The triangle is a representation of the letter Delta Δ. This is the symbol of perfection (10) or completion, and ..... of the current offensive in K:

How does that tie-in with the investigation? Well, Delta is the fourth number of the alphabet. The counter-incursion began on 6 August 2024, that reversed is 6.8(449). 2024 (440).

In Egyptian mythology, the dominion/house of Apep/Apophis (=biggest country) is 440 cubits long and wide.... for example right under the Kuphu pyramid which has these dimensions. We can assume that is where Osiris/the Pharaoh/Ra gets revived after battling death/darkness.

But also, the womb (μήτρα) numerical value is 449.. . .Delta represents the pubic triangle . . 

“As we have seen, the Δ was also used in the sixth century BCE as a symbol for the number ten in the Herodianic numerical system, being the initial letter of deka, ten. The delta's triangular shape also led to it being used as a symbol for the female pudenda. -- Kieren Barry, Greek Qabalah (pgs. 70-71)

Now, the downward pointing and upward pointing triangles of Monte Grisa become clear. It is the cycle/dominion of life (Hathor/Horus/Osiris) and death(Apep), represented by inverted pyramids, in which the sun/Horus/Ra/life is born.


In the Greek Qabbalah, the Greek vowels form a pyramid with alpha at the top and Omega at the bottom. Clearly Alpha represents Hathor/the horns of the bull/the Sun disk between her horns and Omega - Osiris/Orion/the underworld.

But there is more. Just when U started their attack on K, they announced the reception of the first Fighting Falcon F 16 planes. Now, the falcon is Horus who represents black Ham (the violent son of Noah,


Hamas means violence, and the first king of Egypt). The black actor Danzel Washington represented Horus in the prophetic movie "The Equalizer", killing "Vladimir Pushkin" in the end. And the planes/wings represent the rebirth of the Sun .  Not coincidentally Hiroshima, where Europe pledged the F16 for U, was the death place of the Japanese empire and the birthplace of the Japanese modern state.

Hiroshima G7 summit - wings of love and destruction

 

Above image: The venue for the G7 summit in Hiroshima (Grand Prince Hotel Hiroshima) where the world coalition headed by Ursula Von Der Leyen decided to supply Ukraine with F16 fighter jets. + An ancient Egyptian wall painting - the Book of the Earth in Ramesses VI’s tomb with Hathor on top giving Khepri/the Sun/Beetle wings to fly in order to restore life...... The Bonsai tree centerpiece especially resembles the reborn beetle that has gained wings (check the fanned wings Papier-mâché composition on top).




You are my faith
You are my hope
Spread your Wings of love
Tears are pouring from the heart of peace, our children are crying Only together you and I will be able to warm them
Dear mother planet is covered in blood
We will heal the pain accumulated with you with love
O my brother, take my hand Love and peace will stop the torment

Lyrics: Thomas Bergersen - Wings for Ukraine

 
Hiroshima is where the war ended....and where the Ukraine war ends?

 "Death has two processes in nature. One destroys, the other - builds up. You cant build, if you haven't destroyed first. Mary is the woman who walks around, destroys and purifies everything"

And yet.... God will have the final word about killing and reviving...with the final killing (second death) and reviving (resurrection of the dead)

 
1 Samuel 2:6
The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up.

 

Variously, the pyramid of life is represented as the pubic triangle of the sky goddess Nut/Bet, giving birth, or the Nile Delta itself (which is an inverted triangle on the map). Horus is also like Cain, who tended the garden, defeated his brother and set up a civilization marked by order and merit. But we are not interested in the anti christianism of it right now.

How, where does that lead us? Whether the U offense is Atum, entering the womb of Nut to produce Horus, or Horus+Ra or Osiris, entering the dominion of Apep to be revived, the end result is the same = life. However, for life to appear, there must be death. The seed must be planted. The Sun must be submerged. And the chaotic Apep must prove on the surface he has taken hold of that he is only capable of one thing = death and destruction which no doubt will be magnified very soon. The U offensive in Kursk has shaked his power and his final counterattack will no doubt be very apocalyptic.

 UPDATE 26.08.2024.

 
This also explains why the triangles in Sofia and Trieste (not the ones in Trieste city proper but the marine one) have their hypotenuse directed East. The domain/reign of Apep is under the pyramid base and the incarnation of Apep, Putin, rules in the East. No surprise then that the pope carried his speech at the base of the triangles/hypotenuse. The pope is Thoth, the judge and preacher god of the underworld, who preached at the lost souls still trapped in the underworld chambers of Apep. In the case of Sofia, these are the "Russian" monuments, the Alexander Nevsky cathedral and the Tsar Alexander monument which are placed to the far East, beneath the pyramid triangle. In the case of Trieste, it is simply slavonic Slovenia.

 

 

 

 

The doctrines of grace

Why I'm now a thorough "calvinist" (the doctrine of grace preached before and without calvin by baptists).



I WILL UPDATE THIS POST WITH MY RANDOM THOUGHTS PERTAINING TO FREE WILL< THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD, PREDESTINATION AND THE WORSHIP OF WILL AND HUMAN POTENTIAL, WHICH EVEN MOST BAPTIST UNKNOWINGLY PARTICIPATE IN>




Disclaimer: I believe there are good, God serving christians, who are not of this persuasion. By this i mean the many independent baptists, who are made by the grace of God willing to selflessly serve the Lord and not conform to the world and the flesh. However, i believe this doctrine is very important for the advancement of the gospel,  correct understanding of the person and power of God, and for the security and reasonable service of the christian. I will attempt to shed light on the more difficult passages, which appear to speak unlimited atonement, whereas they don't.




NINTH 10.01.2016




One of the common criticisms of free-willers against "calvinists" is that God wouldn't command people to believe and repent if they are unable to. Yet the nation of Israel were given the decalogue and they were never capable to fulfill it, because it is unfulfillable by flesh, (they couldnt perform the ceremonial law perfectly, even). So God can command or condemn at his will, like everything else.


Next one: "the doctrine of election causes pride". I answer thus: Then Jesus put a stumblingblock and led his disciples into pride when he said "I have chosen you" (John 15)

Isaiah 41:8
But thou, Israel, art my servant, Jacob whom I have chosen, the seed of Abraham my friend.

The doctrine of election doesn't cause pride, but HUMILITY. Why? Because if you are chosen from the sea of worthless creatures, you are a "earthen vessel" and "taken from the flocks" or was "without Christ", "a cattle driver" and so forth, you have nothing to boast, as God has "chosen things which are not, to bring to nought things that are". The purpose of God of making the scum of the earth the cream of heaven is revealed in the entire scriptures. Many of the prophets were completely unaware of God's plan for them and took no pride in being CHOSEN for their great and monumental missions. That earthen vessel carries something that far surpasses it's own value, so in this juxtaposition it can find no source of pride.  The riches, power, wisdom of Christ are always underlined as opposed to our feebleness, worthlessness and ignorance.

Psalm 65
4 Blessed is the man whom thou choosest, and causest to approach unto thee, that he may dwell in thy courts: we shall be satisfied with the goodness of thy house, even of thy holy temple.

The sentences of the election of saints are never appendaged with clauses such as "because you were *****". One of the main works of God in an elect individual is to convince him of his sin, in which there is no place of pride.  Paul exalts God's mercy when talking about his election. The elect are those on the highways, who enter, because the "worthies" (religious and eminent persons, the jews etc) are just as unworthy.

For the sake of comparison, look at it this way. Which of the following two person will receive ovations and praise: The one who answers a million dollar question OR the one who wins the lottery? Making the right choice (if it was possible) with what you believe, I would say that is so, so much harder than a million dollar question. You might say "but its not the same as one requires faith and the other reason" . Yet you cannot arrive at a decision without a thought process, or can you ..... shoot in the dark? Can you say "i believe in this proposition just like that" or "because it sounds better". But if it does sound better, why so few embrace it??? There are so many problems with free-willism, its incredible, in the end it always goes in the way of biblical anthropology (the make up of man in the bible). Whereas winning the lottery..... well..... we all know how people envy those farmers, store clerks, pensioners etc who win without any effort. Because they have received something they dont deserve. And we?





SEVENTH AND EIGHT 04-05.01.2016



Historical documents of the Waldenses proving at least some of them were predestinarian.

4. We believe that there is one Holy Church, which is the congregation
of all the elect and faithful, which were from the beginning of the
world, and shall be to the end thereof — of which our Lord Jesus
Christ is the head, which is governed by his word, and guided by the
Holy Ghost: In which all good Christians ought to remain, for it prays
for all incessantly, and the word thereof is agreeable to God, without
which no one can be saved.

 -- Waldense confession of faith is extracted from “Mendes Francois,” by Charles du Moulin;

II. All that have been, or shall be saved, were elected by God before all
worlds.

III. They who are saved cannot miss of salvation.

IV. Whosoever maintaineth free-will, wholly denieth predestination.
and the Grace of God.

--RULES OF FAITH AND PRACTICE ADOPTED BY ALL THE
WALDENSES, WHO MET IN ONE ASSEMBLY AT ANGROGNE,
SEPTEMBER 12, 1535. (after contact with reformers)

3. HERE EVERY ONE MAY BE REPROVED, WHO SAYS, THAT
GOD DID NOT MAKE MAN TO ALLOW HIM TO PERISH.

...............................

May it please that Lord, who formed the world, that we may be of
the number of his elect, to dwell with him in his court for ever!

-The Noble Leycon

MIN. What is that which thou believest concerning the holy church?

ANSW. I say that the church is considered two manner of ways, the one
substantially, and the other ministerially. As it is considered substantially,
by the holy catholic church is meant all the elect of God, from the
beginning of the world to the end, by the grace of God through the merit of
Christ, gathered together by the Holy Spirit, and foreordained to eternal
life; the number and names of whom are known to him who has ejected
them: and in this church remain none who are reprobate. But the church as
it is considered according to the truth of the ministry, is the company of
the ministers of Christ, together with the people committed to their
Charge, using the ministry by faith hope and charity

-Catechism of the ancient Waldenses, for the instruction of their youth

Lindanus, a Roman Catholic bishop of the see of Ghent, who
wrote in defense of the tenets of the Church of Rome, about the
year 1560, represents John Calvin as the inheritor of the doctrine
of the Waldenses.Mezeray, the learned historiographer of France, in his Abridgment
of Chronology, speaking of the Waldensos, says, “They held
nearly the same opinions as those who are now called Calvinists.”


Gualter, a Jesuitical monk, in his chronological tables, drew up a
catalogue, consisting of seven and twenty particulars, in which he
shows that the principles of the Waldensos, and those of the
Calvinists, coincided with each other.


Eckius reproached Luther, that he had only renewed the heresiesof the Waldenses and Albigenses, of Wickliff and of John Huss, which had been long ago condemned. Bellarmine asserts, that the identical belief which was publicly taught and professed in the vallies of Piedmont, in the year 890, and onwards, was the very same which is at this day professed and
owned by the Reformed Churches.


Genebrard, a Benedictine monk, born in 1537, in the third book of
his Chronicles, calls the doctrine of Claude and his followers, in rejecting the traditions of Rome, Calvinistic doctrines; and denominates the Waldenses, Calvinists.

http://www.godrules.net/library/perrin/92perrin1.htm

HISTORY OF THE ANCIENT CHRISTIANS - J P Perrin

(warning, there is some controversy against baptists in the book, and the view that the waldenses were paedobaptist is held, but Perrin's sources THEMSELVES say that infant baptism is the work of antichrist)


PDF LINK FOR THE BOOK:


http://www.righteousnessislove.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Jean-Paul-Perrin-History-of-the-Ancient-Christains.pdf



*******************



Yet another problem with the free-will gospel, or i should rather say, the grace-less gospel, is that it removes the perception of a just and hell-binding God. If your gospel presentation includes statements such as "God doesn't want anyone to perish" or "God is waiting for ALL sinners to come to Him" you have effectively de-personalised God from his eternal justice. You create a schizophrenic God, who wants everyone to be saved, yet hell exists for some reason. And the carnal mind must latch on the "positive" aspect of God, discarding his judging role, and construes a God that doesn't punish severely, a Saviour from nothingness.... because God doesn't throw in hell, God doesn't want people to go to hell, God doesn't dispense wrath due to sin (but only unbelief), you can ALWAYS go to heaven or hell. (contrary to the tenor of Luke 16)  in short such salvation is very acceptable to the carnal mind, because it is a salvation from nothingness, a non-threat,  it is just a whim of the carnal mind to grab something appealing to the senses, a Christ, who is a do-all boy, a genie whom you control anytime you want.


On the other hand, if you say that God ACTUALLY WANTS SOME people to go to hell and SOME (FEW) to go to heaven, WELL IF I HEARD THAT ID BETTER MAKE SURE IM WITH THE SECOND CROWD!!! The door is small, therefore, go fast and find it!!!



I presume there is no better way to pluck men out of the SAVING hand of God, than to preach this YOU CAN DO IT NOW nonsense. If you are saving yourself, throwing yourself in hell, there is no need to rush, you have all the time of the world as you are omnipotent. But i'd say, to preach correctly , you need to unroll the plan of God for the wicked and the righteous, the total and unbroken power of God over life and will on earth, beginning to end of world and of life. And that includes the power of God over the circumstances of your salvation. The passover wasn't available all year round, Jesus wasn't on earth for more than a few years. David said "if you (if you have the ears) hear His voice, don't harden your hearts" and it is not talking about making a decision in your lifetime, later in hebrews we read "Esau sought him with tears and did not find place for repentance". Therefore you are not warned about postponing to death, but to the point where you will not be able to believe, even if you tried to and you will sink in despair and die. So urgency is due to God's plan.And to reject Christ when he is presented to you clearly, you are on the road of reprobation as you have blasphemed the Holy Ghost.




To present man as a modern Adam is horrible error, as man's constitution changed for the worse from the garden. There is, in fact, no worse example of a free creature than Adam, because he sinned in the presence of God himself. Do you dare to say you would have made the correct "choice"? Adam had some deficiency or lack of conformity before his sin, otherwise he would have stuck to God. That is the reason the second Adam creates second adams, who cannot be deceived, the first adams will ALWAYS be deceived, considering their father was deceived before the FALL!!! (1 John 5:18). Like father like sons. How much more will the sons surpass their father in disobedience on the rotten earth with the devil and his host among them. It is Christ's power to break the snare of sin and the devil to release the minds and consciences to God. In other words to undo the works of the devil in men. How idiotic is to throw all this out in the garbage bin with a simple claim to freedom of choice? Where is Christ, where is the Devil? Are they your left hand and your right? Are they your children, with whom you decide the outcome of their struggle?



Setting that aside with such appeal to reason and human will, you are flattering and enticing sinners to believe they are the ones who "set aside" their sins, it is not Christ who covers the sin, but the sinner who "gives up" his sin through the power of his will, another condensed form of the gospel of works. If this argument is proposed to free-willers they will immediately deny that they ascribe something positive in the fallen creature, but they will never provide a consistent definition of free will, except that it is..... free.



Jesus Christ is the beginning and the end, the first and the last, the author and finisher of our faith. This phraseology denotes eternity, Christ is something that goes beyond the creation (as He is God) yet the free-willers fail to see how his perpetuity isn't his mercy and love's perpetuity. God's mercy and love to his elect entails their entire lives before conversion - in the material ordering of events, stirring of emotions and bending of human will towards HIS will and continues after rebirth in the support of their faith and purity, through the intercession of the faithful Christ , to the very end (Eph 1:4-5)..The Israelites were in God's positive will even before they were in the testicles of Jacob. He didn't simply drop his law and prophets on their heads as he suddenly decides to include them in his will. Not just their lives of faith. When Christ says to John "I am the first and the last" this is his immediate comfort for the chosen for the kingdom, that their sins are forgiven - beginning to end, that their faith is secure-  from the giving to the reclaiming to heaven, that God's plan is good for those who are within his eternal love. But baptists choose to clip off God's positive will before salvation (which is by them claimed initiated by the person!) and make God a follower, not a leader.


SIXTH 26.12.2015 


One of the better references for the particular love/atonement of John 3:16 is Deutoronomy 10

15 Only the LORD had a delight in thy fathers to love them, and he chose their seed after them, even you above all people, as it is this day.

Psalm 16:3 But to the saints that are in the earth, and to the excellent, in whom is all my delight.

Continuing with "little flock". The catholics have massive problems with such verses. They anticipate world dominion. If God has provided free will for all, then sooner or later all would be COMPELLED (either by human reason or force...) to enter the church. The standard methods of changing one's mind would be sufficient.But human eloquence or threatening without or intermingled with the gospel produces false converts - hypocrites or self-deluded slaves. The flock of Christ is drawn by His "cords of love" alone, without human interference.. Not that His love is little, but it is applied to a  select few.

Luke 12:32
Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom.

In fact, if you believe in free will in divine matters, then you should also believe that conversion is a matter of persuasion or intellectual conviction..... Yet the carnal mind is enmity to God and the greatest orators and preachers have left millions unsaved after their sermons.People have attended churches for decades dying in disbelief, even if hearing the gospel almost daily and being begged by their relatives to reconsider.If free will is the entry point of faith, what makes the believing different from the others? Some kind of  hidden"common sense"? What makes you more reasonable than your philosopher or logician or mathematician friend. What makes you more understanding than your linguist or psychologist neighbour? What exactly makes you more special? And what makes the "decision" of accepting Christ different than any other decision? I have heard baptist pastors preaching that the faith of Christ is just like any other human conviction, following a deliberation. What blasphemy! True preachers of the gospel can attest that the conversion and repentance is not a decision but a miraculous change (sometimes even against the perceived/professed will of the person, which wonderfully, unexpectedly, without any prior thought, without season (time), is conformed to the will of God), as it was with my wife, who literally broke down in tears, infused with the power of the Holy Ghost. What makes you more special? All who believe have received the faith from above and should not boast of a whimsical "decision".(1 Cor 4:7) He chose us.



FIFTH 25.12.2015



One point of contention between the free willers and predestinarians is the scope of election. The scripture is clear on this matter. The elect WILL BE FEW. Therefore, if God was supposed to want the salvation of all and would have left men with the means to at least approximate that wish, the saved would at some point be a majority or at least a sizeable minority. This also fits with the free-willistic interpretation of 2 Peter 3:9, where they interpret the desire of God as the desire for the salvation of the entire human race.

 

9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

Here, however the patience and longsuffering is towards US., the elect, as with Paul

16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting.

The patience of God is manifest only towards those who he has foreseen and preordained. We are to exhibit the same patience with respect to His coming, as there might be many more generations of elect to be born after us and gathered. 

Behold, the husbandman waiteth for the precious fruit of the earth, and hath long patience for it, until he receive the early and latter rain.

However, with the progress of generations comes the increase in tares and chaff, so that more people go to hell with each generation. If God was patient &c towards the unbelieving, he would have sent more means of grace and would have saved a lot more in proportion to the unbelieving. God and Noah waited for the ark to be built, that period was used for the condemnation of the world, not for its salvation (Heb 11:7; Rev 11:5). The two witnesses give rain where God wants (speak the words of grace and convert souls; Heb 6:7), and breathe fire on the rest (Heb 6:8), which symbolically means condemnation to hell (one are baptized in water&holy spirit, the other in fire Mat 3:11,12).(The reprobates have a timer on their own - to fulfill their sins and the sins of their fathers (The works of unrighteousness from their like-minded predecessors) (Ps 92:7; Genesi 15:1; Rev 14:15)



Now would be convenient to explain the dual role of the gospel, but i leave that for another time.



 


To be continued.....


Fourth 25.12.2015

Let me get this straight. Jesus died for EVERYONE IN THE WORLD, but only EXPLICITLY prays for those whom the Father had given, and for those who will believe? This further proves that he died for those of the world, who will believe, either with him or with the apostles and their disciples, and not for the totality of human beings in the world.


John 17:9
I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me;

 
Why do so many "evangelicals" hate "calvinists"?. Precisely because they are not saved. They maintain free will, because "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God." It is scary for the flesh to be in the hands of God (under the positive or negative will). Therefore for the unsaved sinner it is appeasing to have an "open door" of denying Christ, when he isn't desired or of accepting him at a later time, when the body is worn down for sin. Because they don't want to "hear his voice" and want to postpone, like constantine and others. However that  is not possible. Otherwise everyone could live ungodly and only accept christ at his deathbed. God is not mocked. The passover was to be eaten on the same night. The Holy Spirit visited the world in the appointed time, to produce the fruit of salvation, Christ. So it visits and saves the sinner in an appointed time. It is not for us to choose the time of our salvation.



Third 24.12.2015

Thanks for Avles' comment to direct my mind to an important fact about the blood covenant.

avles24 декември 2015 г., 8:17

"northern baptists/waldenses were free-willers and the southern/albigenses were predestinarians"

Very interesting, thank you for your info, this add further spiritual fuel for the struggle against the wiles of Satan, and his machinations to hide the martyrdom of Bogomils and others, the elect of God. They are scared of it because those martyrs speaks well of predestination. If you let the neighbor to slain you it means you are fully aware you are an elect, and of predestination.

 This is the key here. The elect of God know they are the sheep for the slaughter and accept it. They accept the slaughter of Christ as a Saviour/Righteous man for their sin and accept their own slaughter as his blood-kin. Whereas the persecutors accept the slaughter of Christ as an evil-doer and the slaughter of the righteous as his associates.



And the persecutors of the righteous WERE NEVER included in the covenant of blood, as that covenant is offered only on behalf of the RIGHTEOUS(BY GOD). Abel's FATLING SACRIFICE WAS NEITHER FROM, NOR FOR CAIN. The PASSOVER was NEITHER FROM, NOR FOR THE EGYPTIANS.


4 And Abel, he also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. And the LORD had respect unto Abel and to his offering:




SECOND(24/12/2015)



what John 3:16 says.  



16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.


Free willers and baptists usually say that "whosoever" means that Jesus died for all and so "anyone" can be saved. However this verse says that whosoever believeth (i.e. ALL THAT BELIEVE,   ANYONE of the believing) will be saved.

It doesn't say "God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that noone should perish"


That doesnt mean we shouldnt preach the gospel, but that many people will not get saved, because God will not grant them faith and repentance. This verse actually teaches election and predestination, not an offer for all. Jesus died for the believing of all nations (the world).




FIRST(23/12/2015)

------------------------------------


I have never read Calvin's books. I have read Gill's commentaries and a few other books on different subjects, but never a "systematic theology", only brief expositions of passages. Folks, its (un)common spiritual sense.



A copy of my comment towards a baptist minister preaching against the doctrine of predestination




Pastor, the jews also clinged to jesus through their choice, to which Jesus was aware when He said:


65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

Thereby destroying their "free choice" hubris.


You don't need the greek to have common sense: 

Which is come unto you, as it is IN ALL THE WORLD; and bringeth forth fruit, as it doth also in you, since the day ye heard of it, and knew the grace of God in truth:

And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, BELIEVED ON IN THE WORLD,

Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached IN THE WHOLE WORLD, there shall also this, that this woman hath done, be told for a memorial of her.

The entire world was not evangelized in the first two decades after Jesus' death and we don't mention the woman in our modern missions worldwide. (Therefore the word world (cosmos) doesn't always signify the entire world, and actually it is almost never used in the sense. The context of Jesus dying for the World reveals that the meaning is not that he died for all people born, but that  he saves not only jews, who think they are special, but gentiles from all provinces of the roman empire - THE *FIRST* WORLD KNOWN AT THAT TIME. He gave his life not only for the lost sheep of the house of Israel, but of the children abroad, the sheep of the other fold, the branches to be grafted etc., which of course leads a man to believe he has his own BEYOND THAT REALM., which should be gathered. What God was telling the jews was "Jesus died not only for israel, but for the NATIONS of the world. This completely destroys the notion that limited atonement makes people anti-missionary minded . The correct exegesis of the "dying for the world" make a case for missionary effort, SINCE CHRIST HAS ELECT IN THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE WORLD TO BE GATHERED; FROM EVERY KNEE, TONGUE, NATION, TRIBE.  REVELATION 5:9)

  Millions and millions are in hell, never having heard the gospel. Did they get the same "chance", pastor? 



  Also, you claim God loves everyone. Yet we are commanded to

1 John 3:18 ..............love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.

If God loves the unbelieving the same way he does the CHOSEN, then he is a hypocrite, because he doesn't love them in deed (in reality).

If God is

1. Omnipotent
2. All-loving


Why doesn't he save everyone?
Ah, but you will say "He wants to leave it up to them".
So he leaves it up to them, when they are enslaved to sin, which they senselessly indulge in, captive by the devil, blind and dead in sins, ignorant of the life of God? Do you leave your kid to decide what's best for him? You would surely agree that leaving a kid to himself spells disaster. God doesn't discipline us into salvation, but creates a loving and obedient NEW creature in us, that is not only capable, but willing of faith, repentance etc.






Pastor, the God you describe is weak, unloving and indecisive.
The God of the bible brings power unto salvation, opens hearts and grants faith and repentance. The God of the bible's love for HIS BRIDE is larger than the world, let alone my puny human brain and its mental faculties.
The God of the bible worketh all things after the counsel of his own will.
He doesn't wait or hope man "receives him".
He knows whats inside man. 


An undeserving sinner, saved not by choice, but by the powerful grace of God.