Satan's new testament - the Egyptian connection , "It is I whom am a man, you who are women"

 

Since there is "nothing new under the sun" we are bound to find the contours of the current social and even geopolitical situation back in the corridors of time. Concretely, since we are the brink of the final (hopefully) refounding and reunification of the (un)Holy Roman Empire, we must look at the point in history where its shape was forming. The Satanic project for the Roman Empire was for it to be an inheritor of all paganism and a sworn enemy to the people of God at a time when there was a mingling of religions and cultures under the wing of Rome. And as we all know too well, all pagan religions and heresies morphed into the state church of Constantine. This ancient pagan hatred towards the hyper-masculine monarchical God, our God the Father and His Christ and Spirit, embedded in humanity, underlies the efforts for a new liberal, human-rights based, eco-feminist ecumenist civilization which, from its newfound strength, will attempt to annul everything Christ stands for - patriarchy (the Father), sola Christus (real Jesus), Apocalypticism (the Spirit of prophecy) etc.

The core nature of the citizen of this civilization is supposed to be of a earth-conscious and female-conscious earthling who has vowed to protect the feelings of mankind and the future of the planet. These feelings and this future are nothing more than the self-righteous ambition that has commenced with Cain who made cursed earth his home and his kingdom, and was the first to advance civilization. One of the most revolting aspect of the spirit of pride and arrogance that underlies the end stage development of civilization is the rejection of male/female identity. Or in other words "transgenderism.". In a recent segment on Fox News, Tucker Carl-son, an agitator for the conservative cause, gave a surprisingly accurate description of the mindsets of both christians and trans-people.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ya8Ab-xYig0

Transgenders claim power and dominion over nature that has never been given to man. Whereas christians acknolwedge guilt and the resulting loss of dominion over creation. In other words, christians are content with their stations, and transgenders are not. And both sides consider their position "gospel". Which leads to apparently contradictory philosophies at the most basic level of identity - the human sex. Now what is the matter here? Isn't Tucker right? Of course he is. But what he conveniently omits in his analysis is that there is a final goal - to reconciliate both groups, but only after a blood bath has occurred and everyone considers reconciliation a miracle. Talking partisan heads like Carson are the fuel to the fire, the catalysts to a very malevolent scheme. The apogee of the present conflict is far from reached - there needs to be blood in order to have a piedestal for the peace-maker, aka Mary or rather the Mary-Jesus alchemical alloy. An apparition of both at the same time is certainly possible. As I previously discussed, the goal of the RCC is to unify the male and female, Jesus and Mary, the masculine East and Feminine west, under the secret power of the sorcery of Rome. What concerns us is not what the exact final form of it, but that it is not simply discarding one, but elevating one at the expense of the other in the amalgamation. The goal of feminism, transgenderism, elevating Mary etc is both to dethrone the man and enthrone the woman while appearing to reconcile them as if the male has been an usurper. Whatever the final result may be isn't entirely clear, but the expense in the case of christians vs liberals will be the claim to exclusivity of the radical viewpoint that has been promulgated by force. And part of that radical viewpoint is the Bible and its distinctive doctrines.



The christians in the US are the pro-gun party which represents fundamentalists from all over the world, and have been calling for a revolt, secession, or at least armed resistance, so they will have to renounce the claim to exclusivity and the right to evangelize as their credibility and legitimacy will have been destroyed. Not that they have much credibility and legitimacy already - pope Francis once said (and we know he says nothing but that which can be accepted by the world) that a fundamentalist, even if he doesn't hurt anyone, is violent. Fundamentalism has to go. But only hyper-masculine and "aggressive""doctrines must be emasculated. Good ole family values and roles will be upheld. as long as they are limited to the privacy of the home. That will be considered the only sensible solution to prevent another conflict. And the paranoia of the "conservatives" will be quelled. Bibles will be edited, preachers will be muzzled and even if the "conservative" religion retains its conservative character, the power, freedom, apocalyptic urgency, purity of the gospel, will be gone. The Pharaoh was happy for the jews to sacrifice in Egypt, as long as they blended in Egypt. He was unhappy at the promises of God - both positive and negative. (Exodus 8:25).

Gender fluid to fill the cup of abominations

But why transgenderism - why is it the champion of the dark powers of this world? Not just because it is a gross violation of nature, an apostatic catastrophic abandonment of the creative purpose of male and female stations (Jude 1:6-7). But also to provoke a fearful survivalist response in the psyche of christians. Threatening one's property is not good enough, the progeny and genitals are far more precious and close to "home". In this Satan has proven himself a masterful tactician, using this boogeyman as a driving force in his new scheme (Fear- Hebrews 2:15; Isaiah 8:12). But there is more - by polarizing society so much, the gnostic alchemists seek to prove their power over opposites. As the war drags on, societies become split into camps diametrically opposite on almost any issue. In fact, so opposite, that if one doesnt suspect that something is amiss, his intelligence can be rightfully brought into question. Now in this the ambition is clear - to do what Moses couldn't. After all, as we already saw, the spiritual re-incarnation (if one can say that) of the ancient Egyptian priesthood lives on as todays secret societies. As we all too well know, Moses couldn't reconcile the conflicting jews and was driven away (Exodus 2:13). Now Jesus himself admitted that he is not here to provide peace between men - in fact the opposite. Of course that didn't come from lack of ability but of the nature and purpose of the gospel - to divide. And we are carried back to the discussion of separation. Where Moses and Jesus failed or where they did wrong  - in separating the sexes and separating nations (as both drew a sword against their kingmen - the law and gospel) - the alchemists will claim victory or do right. According to the alchemical formula:

                         "Join the male and the female, and you will find what is sought."

Transgenderism is no new thing under the sun or rather from hell. The lack of binary sexual identity was present in ancient Egyptian culture, which had a third gender....

Thus it is often said that Neith is both feminine and masculine – “two thirds masculine, one third feminine,” (Esna, vol. 5, p. 110) – both mother and father, “who inaugurated birth when birth had not yet been,” (Lichtheim, vol. 3, p. 38), having “appeared from herself,” (Esna, vol. 5, p. 253). The primordial register in which Neith’s cosmogonic activity occurs can be seen from the fact that, in the version from Esna, Neith brings forth both Re, the principle of cosmic order, and Apophis, the principle of entropy.

Neith

https://henadology.wordpress.com/theology/netjeru/neith/

It is curious that when the desert fathers and mothers appeared, gender identities again became blurred, partly due to the asexual nature of ascetism, but mostly due to the demonic spirit of pride occupying the skulls of the ascetics. This usurping spirit is evident in the sayings of one notable desert "mother":

Amma Sarah lived in the desert of Peluseum, perhaps situated in the Arsinoite or Fayyum area. She evidently encountered masculine doubts concerning her valid identity as a desert-dweller. Her sayings include the assertion, addressed to male ascetics: "It is I whom am a man, you who are women"

 

 The contagious nature of this rebellion against every institution (remember, the openly gnostic fathers and mothers of the desert fathers and mothers were fighting against all authority, and especially against Christ who concentrates all authority in Heaven and Earth) can be seen in the fact that the social atmosphere in this church period had drastically changed - so much so that the once patriarchal and monarchical Empire was being emasculated, which is the true process underlying  "christianity weakening the Roman empire". In this sense the gnostics accomplished their task of pulling down the power of the authoritarian monarchic masculine Emperor - the Empire - with the massive drain of human potential into monasteries and deserts - then was giving way to the masculine East - the Eurasian steppe and its never-ending torrents of invading barbarian tribes.  The so called church fathers, however, being part of the intellectual elite, had no issue with the loss of traditional roles and identities, as they considered themselves and their followers sexless angel-like humans who had transcended the mundane.

By "divesting themselves of sexual indentification" the ascetics attempted to divest themselves from humanity altogether and enter a new mode of existence - of saviors of the human race, usurpers of God. This ambitious spirit of rebellion had darkened their ancestors the Egyptians and gnostics so much , that they believed that their true god was virginal hermaphrodite caricature that polluted itself. The name of the game is always the same - pulling down God to the level of fallen humanity, and exalting humanity to the level of God. But first it must be proven that other identities once thought of as shatterproof can be destroyed.  First man(woman) must be exalted, then God pulled down. Jesus can't be allowed to be separate from sinners. Or women. It is an attempt, rightfully noted by Avles of the spirithismouth.blogspot.com blog to merge the body of Christ with the world and deface it. This is the reason the exaltation of the female deity remains to be seen - there needs to be some groundwork done. The daring insolence of this spirit explains why we frequently find in the blasphemous vocabulary of the feminists words like "fragile", "weak", "basic"

. The distrust and ill feeling of the rulers of the Roman empire towards the ascetics was justified. They sensed in them more than an aspiration to power - but a madness that went into unspeakable heights.  In ancient society the move to become a monk/nun was even more scandalous and radical than today. It was a venture beyond nature, custom, common sense... it was mystical and outrageous...sensational and courageous. In reality it was a burst of mania before death, an abomination of civilizations that had overstayed their welcome and under the influence of Satan were mutating like end stage cancer cells. The Roman world had stared at itself self-absorbed for so long it was beginning to obsess with genitals. The term "navel gazing religion" used for self absorbed piety should in reality be renamed "genital gazing". The Bible describes this profanity in Romans 1 as the gradual darkening and debasement of the heathen.

The Rebel Virgins and Desert Mothers Who Have Been Written Out of Christianity’s Early History

From the beginning, the followers of Jesus of Nazareth comprised a movement that was extreme, countercultural—a revolution that embraced both men and women, even social outcasts and slaves. In those first centuries, while the religion was still defining itself as an institution, many devout women flouted cultural convention and chose Jesus himself—not bishops and bureaucrats—as their personal guide. These women had permission to live beyond their gender as the leaders and patrons of local congregations, as preachers and ecstatic prophets and tough ascetics. .......

That said, laws passed by Augustus just before the start of the Common Era still required all upper-class men to marry and all women to procreate, in a return to Roman family values that were largely political myth. Women could only become financially independent—or, simply, independent—if they’d been divorced or widowed or given birth to a minimum of three children. To escape this system, some upper-class women went so far as to register as prostitutes in order to have free rein with their own money......

They flaunted their independence from men, refusing to hide away or to veil themselves, rubbing their ethical superiority in married couples’ faces. They dressed to make a statement, sometimes adopting men’s clothing and hairstyles (some sheared their heads entirely), and preached in the streets in drag. Women of all social strata, in a move that evokes the late-1960s hippie exodus from the American suburbs, were abandoning their parents and husbands and homes to follow Christian prophets who claimed to offer a starker, truer interpretation of the gospel, and a chaste life as equals alongside equally devout men. Together, the


https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-rebel-virgins-and-desert-mothers-who-have-been-written-out-of-christianitys-early-history

The article is very plain but several things stand out. First, in a nod to Romanism and its continuous novelties, the phrase "religion still defining itself" implies that christianity was a non settled by truth religion that somehow evolved and perhaps continues to evolve. Secondly we see how the pendulum swing effect created monstrosities - the policies of Augustus oppressing women just created more rebellion that broke out as non traditional roles. The same development can be observed today in the USA where, after the hyper masculine post war 40s and 50s, the sexual revolution and second/third wave feminism broke out. China and the muslim world - same thing. Anyone knowing a number of Chinese and liberal Arab women knows that patriarchal practices and attitudes like foot binding and hijabs have created the most hyper-feminist and unbridled women of our generation. A counterculture as much as anti-god-ism.

It is worth noting that in those times only very few had the time and resources to be infected with the feminist disease. Today, with the growing middle and high classes, the disease can spread further. Capitalism's alienating (rightfully noted by Marx) influence exacerbates the polarization and war between the sexes. Conservatives are right in saying that the rich world men built is coming back to bite them. However the perceived weakness is irrelevant due to the fact that there will be no barbarian invasions to be had in our day. Today, women are becoming more like men due to better informed and safeguarded choices, and men are becoming more like women due to the lack of challenges from outside invaders and hardship that demands manual/physical labor. And our attitude towards nature will not be domination (like the trans community claims) or subordination (like the conservatives claim), but cooperation. The new Roman empire isn't culling the able bodied men to launch a military invasion, but is preparing them for a non-exclusively male god.... by showing them the evil and uselessness of extreme manliness. This alchemical process of both polarization and amalgamation is the leaven which will make the "christian" dough rise in the hands of the wicked woman.


  The fact of the matter is that after the turmoil of the 4th and 5th centuries Roman Catholic society eventually stabilized and marriage was returned to its rightful place. Cooler heads prevailed, since the barbarian menace was growing and getting worse. 

Something like that may be in the papacy's  books for today as well. After a period of polarization and radicalization and global crises, there should come a golden age of mutual understanding and coexistence, with the condition that both sides need to find the golden middle, lay their evangelizing "weapons"of indoctrination and turn against the real problems facing the world - pollution, AI, war, aliens etc. The jesuits can't turn the world into a giant monastery.... but they can turn it into a giant village full of superstitious people who are thankful for the order and peace brought by eliminating fundamentalism and tackling the "real" problems (not sin). A new digital dark age is coming for the now global village. There will be a crying need for humility and understanding each other to work together for the salvation of humanity..... and the gods - i.e. everything we have worked for. 

The bricks are fallen down, but we will build with hewn stones: the sycomores are cut down, but we will change them into cedars. Isaiah 9:10

Ancient Egypt's populace took active part in the salvation of their own gods - the Barque of Ra needed the help of the adepts and dead Osiris was chanted to life. It is no different in the liturgies of both East and West, where the salvation of the human race and the planet is predicated on the sacerdotal role of the priest who creates god in the material world and deifies the world at the same time. A religion that reconciles the ever warring sexes and exalts man so high as to make him a savior of the gods must be extremely appealing to the flesh.